The closest VidCruiter alternatives for one-way video screening are HireVue, Spark Hire, Willo, and myInterview, now sold inside Radancy. Spark Hire and Willo publish starting prices, at $249 per month billed annually and $59 per live role per month, while HireVue, Jobvite, Greenhouse, Harver, and myInterview are quote only. Willo is the only tool here with a 14-day free trial listed on its own site, so it is the easiest way to run a real screening round before a sales call.
We compared 7 options for vidcruiter alternatives. Each profile below lists the price, free plan, pros and cons as published by the company.
On this page
Vidcruiter alternatives: comparison table
Swipe the table sideways on a phone to see every column.
| # | Name | Best for | Starting price | Free plan / trial | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HireVue | Enterprise structured video interviews | quote only | No | Visit |
| 2 | Spark Hire | Small and mid-size teams that want unlimited video interviews | $249 per month | No | Visit |
| 3 | myInterview | Enterprise screening inside Radancy | quote only | No | Visit |
| 4 | Willo | Occasional hiring, charged per live role | $59 per live role per month | Free trial (14 days) | Visit |
| 5 | Jobvite | Mid-size to large teams that want a full talent acquisition suite | quote only | No | Visit |
| 6 | Greenhouse | Structured hiring with scorecards and interview kits | quote only | No | Visit |
| 7 | Harver | High-volume hiring with assessments | quote only | No | Visit |
The 7 best vidcruiter alternatives, in detail
HireVue
Best for: Enterprise structured video interviews
HireVue is the most direct enterprise alternative to VidCruiter. It offers one-way video interviews, live video interviews, and assessments in a single platform, with structured questions and scoring that help large teams compare candidates on the same criteria. That structure matters when hundreds of candidates apply for the same roles.
- HireVue also connects with common applicant tracking systems, so interview results sit beside the rest of the hiring record.
- The main drawback is price transparency.
- HireVue does not publish a price on its pricing page, and buyers need to request a quote.
- Third-party listings mention a starting figure near $35,000 a year for an Essentials tier, but that figure is not on the vendor pricing page, so it sh
Pros
- Structured one-way and live video interviews
- AI-assisted screening and assessments for high-volume hiring
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- built for large employers, so small teams may find it too large and too costly
Spark Hire
Best for: Small and mid-size teams that want unlimited video interviews
Spark Hire offers one-way video interviews, live video interviews, and a behavioural assessment product, plus an applicant tracking system sold under the Recruit name. The video interview product can be bought on its own. On annual billing it starts at $249 per month, or $2,988 a year, and it includes unlimited one-way and live interviews, unlimited jobs and users, live training, and a customer success manager.
- On monthly billing it costs $299 per month, but that plan is limited to 5 jobs and 5 users.
- That published price makes Spark Hire easier to budget than the quote-only tools in this list.
- The video interviews include AI transcription in more than 50 languages, automatic summaries, candidate scoring, and more than 40 applicant tracking s
- The Recruit applicant tracking system starts at $335 per month billed annually for Pro, and $499 per month billed annually for Growth, which adds the
Pros
- Unlimited one-way and live video interviews on the annual video plan
- published pricing with a monthly option at $299 per month
Cons
- The monthly video plan is limited to 5 jobs and 5 users
- the full applicant tracking system is a separate, higher-priced product
myInterview
Best for: Enterprise screening inside Radancy
myInterview was a one-way video interview tool that let employers set questions and let candidates record answers in their own time. Radancy announced in September 2025 that it had acquired myInterview, and the product is now sold as part of Radancy Screening and Scheduling inside the Radancy Talent Acquisition Cloud. The old pricing page is no longer available, and the self-serve monthly plans that older listings still show are no longer sold.
- Inside Radancy, the screening step pairs one-way video answers with a conversational AI agent that screens candidates and books live interviews.
- Radancy describes configurable screening templates, AI-recommended qualifications, transcription, scoring, and scheduling for one-on-one, panel, and m
- The wider platform also covers career sites, candidate relationship management, and onboarding, so myInterview now makes sense mainly for a large empl
- A small team that wants a simple tool with a published price should look at Spark Hire or Willo instead.
Pros
- One-way video screening with AI screening and scheduling in the wider Radancy platform
- scheduling syncs with Outlook, Google Calendar, and Microsoft Teams
Cons
- No longer sold as a standalone product, so small teams cannot buy the old self-serve plans
- no published price, free plan, or trial on the vendor site
Willo
Best for: Occasional hiring, charged per live role
Willo is a one-way video interview and candidate screening platform. Employers set questions, and candidates answer with video, audio, text, multiple choice, or a file upload, in their own time. Willo Lite costs $59 per live role per month, with no contract, up to 5 live roles and 5 users, and up to 150 assessed candidates per live role.
- One role open for a full year costs $708 on Lite, while 5 roles open all year cost $3,540.
- Enterprise starts from $3,799 a year on a one-year term.
- That per-role model is the main reason to choose Willo over a flat monthly plan.
- A team that hires in bursts pays only in the months a role is open, and pays nothing in quiet months.
Pros
- Pay as you go per live role, with no annual contract on Lite
- 14-day free trial with full platform access and no credit card required
Cons
- No live video interviews inside the platform, so later rounds need a separate tool
- transcription, Insights scoring, custom scorecards, and native applicant tracking integrations need Enterprise
Jobvite
Best for: Mid-size to large teams that want a full talent acquisition suite
Jobvite is a talent acquisition platform owned by Employ Inc, which also sells Lever and JazzHR. It covers job posting, sourcing, applicant tracking, candidate relationship management, branded career sites, SMS-based applications, and employee referrals. Video interviewing sits inside that wider system, with an AI Companion add-on, rather than as a standalone product.
- That makes Jobvite a better fit for a team that wants to replace several hiring tools at once than for a team that only needs recorded interviews.
- Pricing is quote only on the vendor site.
- Jobvite starts with the core applicant tracking system and adds modules such as onboarding, the AI Companion, and recruitment marketing, so two compan
- Third-party listings show a starting figure near $400 a month, but that figure is not published by Jobvite, so it should not be used as a budget.
Pros
- Full applicant tracking system with candidate relationship management, branded career sites, SMS, and referrals
- modular add-ons for onboarding and recruitment marketing
Cons
- No published price on the vendor pricing page, so the total cost depends on the modules chosen
- video interviewing is part of a wider suite, not a focused standalone tool
Greenhouse
Best for: Structured hiring with scorecards and interview kits
Greenhouse is an applicant tracking system built around structured hiring. Every role gets a scorecard, an interview kit, and a defined plan, and reporting shows where candidates drop out of the process. Video interviewing fits into that structure as part of the interview stage, with scheduling, scorecards, and interviewer feedback kept in the same record.
- Greenhouse sells three plans, Core, Plus, and Pro, and prices each quote by hiring volume, company complexity, and the features needed.
- It does not publish prices, and there is no free plan or trial listed.
- Buyer-reported figures often put entry contracts near $5,000 to $7,000 a year for small Core deployments, but those are third-party estimates, not lis
- Greenhouse suits a growing company with a recruiting team that wants a consistent, documented hiring process.
Pros
- Structured hiring with scorecards, interview kits, and defined hiring plans
- more than 400 integrations in its marketplace, according to the vendor site
Cons
- Quote-only pricing with no published starting price, and no free plan or trial
- implementation and seat costs can raise the first-year total well above the base quote
Harver
Best for: High-volume hiring with assessments
Harver is a volume hiring platform that combines pre-hire assessments, candidate matching, and hiring automation. It is aimed at employers that fill hundreds or thousands of similar roles a year, such as retail floor staff, contact centre agents, warehouse crews, and hospitality teams. Candidates complete assessments and one-way video interviews, and Harver scores and ranks them so recruiters can focus on the strongest applicants first.
- Harver does not publish pricing, and its site routes enquiries to a demo and a sales conversation.
- The price depends on hiring volume, the modules selected, integration work, and any custom content, so buyers should ask which pricing model applies,
- Third-party listings mention a starting figure near $35,000 a year for an Essential tier, but that figure is not on the vendor site.
- Harver suits a large employer with repeatable, high-volume roles and a clear need for assessment-led screening.
Pros
- Pre-hire assessments, candidate matching, and automation built for volume hiring
- one-way video interviews alongside assessments in the same flow
Cons
- No published pricing, so every quote needs a scoping conversation
- built for large employers, so it is not a fit for occasional or low-volume hiring
How we chose
We checked each vendor pricing page on 12 November 2026, using browser searches and direct page reads. Where a vendor published a price, we used it. Where a vendor published no price, we wrote quote only and did not present a third-party estimate as a list price. We also read vendor product pages for the interview types, limits, and plan differences in each block.
We did not claim hands-on testing, and we did not use review scores, awards, customer counts, or test results as selection criteria. We chose tools that offer video interviewing or a closely related screening step, that have a real homepage, and that cover different needs, from low-cost per-role screening to enterprise structured hiring and high-volume assessment.
What to check before you buy
Check the interview type first. One-way video suits early screening, while live video suits later rounds, and some tools offer only one of the two. Willo offers one-way interviews only, so live rounds need a separate tool. Check the candidate limits as well, because a plan can cap roles, users, interviews, or assessed candidates. Spark Hire limits its monthly video plan to 5 jobs and 5 users, and Willo Lite limits each live role to 150 assessed candidates.
Check the price model, not just the headline number. A flat monthly price, a per-role price, and a quote-only annual contract behave very differently across a year. Ask for the annual total, the renewal terms, and any implementation, migration, training, or integration fees in writing. Ask which features are locked behind a higher tier, such as transcription, custom scorecards, single sign-on, and API access. Check data retention and candidate consent for AI scoring.
Use the decision table below to match a tool to your team size and budget. It uses the prices checked on 12 November 2026.
| Team size and hiring pattern | Budget guide | Best fit from this list | | 1 to 20 staff, 1 to 5 hires a year | Under $1,000 a year, pay only when hiring | Willo Lite, at $59 per live role per month | | 20 to 100 staff, steady hiring all year | $2,988 a year for video interviews | Spark Hire, at $249 per month billed annually | | 100 to 500 staff, structured hiring | Quote needed, expect $5,000 a year or more for an applicant tracking system | Greenhouse or Jobvite, by written quote | | 500 or more staff, high-volume roles | Quote needed, expect enterprise pricing | HireVue or Harver, by written quote | | Large employer, screening inside a full talent cloud | Quote needed, demo first | myInterview inside Radancy |
Before you sign, run one real role through the tool you shortlist. Use the Willo trial where it is available, or ask for a demo with your own questions and scorecard. Confirm how candidates receive the invite, how they record on a phone, how long videos are stored, and how your team exports scores and notes.
Frequently asked questions
Is VidCruiter free for employers?
No, VidCruiter is a commercial hiring platform, and employers need a contract to use it. Candidates do not pay to complete an interview, but that does not mean the employer account is free. Willo offers a 14-day free trial, while the other tools in this list need a quote or a monthly plan.
Which VidCruiter alternative is cheapest for a small team?
Willo Lite is usually the cheapest option for a small team that hires in bursts, at $59 per live role per month, with no annual contract. One role open for a year costs $708. Spark Hire costs $249 per month billed annually, or $2,988 a year, which is higher, but it includes unlimited interviews, jobs, and users on the annual plan.
Does Spark Hire offer a free trial?
No, Spark Hire does not list a free trial or a free plan on its pricing page. The video interview product starts at $249 per month billed annually, or $299 per month on monthly billing, with the monthly plan limited to 5 jobs and 5 users. Buyers who want to test it should ask for a demo.
Can I use Willo for live video interviews?
No, Willo does not offer live video interviews inside the platform. It is built for one-way video, audio, text, and file-based screening, and live rounds happen outside Willo through calendar tools. If you need live interviews in the same tool, look at HireVue or Spark Hire, which both offer live and one-way video.
Is myInterview still available as a standalone tool?
No, myInterview is no longer sold as a standalone product. Radancy acquired it in September 2025, and it is now sold as Screening and Scheduling inside the Radancy Talent Acquisition Cloud. Buyers need a demo and a quote through Radancy.
How much does HireVue cost?
HireVue does not publish a price, so there is no list price to quote here. Its pricing page asks buyers to request pricing, and the cost comes from a custom quote based on hiring volume, modules, and company size. Third-party listings mention a figure near $35,000 a year, but that is not on the vendor pricing page.
Sources
- https://www.hirevue.com/
- https://www.hirevue.com/pricing
- https://www.sparkhire.com/
- https://www.sparkhire.com/pricing
- https://www.myinterview.com/
- https://www.myinterview.com/pricing
- https://www.willo.video/
- https://www.willo.video/pricing
- https://www.jobvite.com/
- https://www.jobvite.com/pricing
- https://www.greenhouse.com/
- https://www.greenhouse.com/pricing
- https://www.harver.com/
Prices and features were read on each company’s own website in November 2026. They change often, so confirm the current offer on the official site before you sign up or buy.