Microsoft Defender for IoT is the best iot security services providers pick for most Microsoft shops, because it is the only item here with a published device price at $0.85 per device per month with an annual commitment, and it is included with Microsoft 365 E5 for up to five enterprise IoT devices per user license. Armis Centrix is the default pick for large mixed estates that need agentless discovery across IT, OT, IoT and medical devices, while Claroty xDome is the stronger cloud choice for industrial cyber-physical systems. Seven of the eight providers do not publish a price, so expect a quote based on asset count, site count, sensor count and modules, and ask for the meter in writing before you compare totals.
Most buyers here are choosing a platform that can see devices that cannot run an agent, from sensors and controllers to medical equipment and building systems. The eight providers below all work at that level, but they differ in deployment, in the protocols they read, and in how they charge. Shortlist two or three, then ask each vendor for a quote on the same asset count and the same sites.
On this page
Best iot security services providers: comparison table
Swipe the table sideways on a phone to see every column.
| # | Name | Best for | Starting price | Free plan / trial | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armis Centrix | Large enterprises with mixed IT, OT and IoT assets | quote only | No | Visit |
| 2 | Claroty xDome | Industrial sites that need cloud CPS protection | quote only | No | Visit |
| 3 | Nozomi Networks Guardian | Multi-site plants that need a cloud rollup | quote only | No | Visit |
| 4 | Dragos Platform | Industrial control system operators | quote only | No | Visit |
| 5 | Microsoft Defender for IoT | Microsoft 365 shops with enterprise IoT devices | $0.85 per device/month | No | Visit |
| 6 | Palo Alto Networks IoT Security | Teams already running Palo Alto firewalls | quote only | No | Visit |
| 7 | Forescout Vistaro Platform | Hospitals and plants with unmanaged devices | quote only | No | Visit |
| 8 | Tenable One OT Exposure | Teams that want IT and OT exposure in one view | quote only | No | Visit |
The 8 best best iot security services providers, in detail
Armis Centrix
Best for: Large enterprises with mixed IT, OT and IoT assets
Armis Centrix finds and classifies assets without installing software on each device. It watches network traffic and uses safe active queries in native industrial protocols to identify legacy and unmanaged equipment. That agentless method matters where an agent cannot be installed on a controller or a medical device.
- The platform ranks vulnerabilities by exploitability, device criticality and operational impact, rather than by a raw severity score alone.
- It maps attack paths and supports secure remote access with multi-factor authentication and just-in-time access.
- Armis offers cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment.
- One limit: the vendor does not publish a price, so the total depends on asset count and modules.
Pros
- Agentless discovery across IT, OT, IoT and medical devices
- Vulnerability Prioritization and Remediation ranks risk by exploitability and device criticality
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- Cloud and on-premises choice adds scoping work before deployment
Claroty xDome
Best for: Industrial sites that need cloud CPS protection
Claroty xDome is a cloud platform for cyber-physical systems, covering industrial OT, healthcare and commercial IoT in one system. The foundation is xDome Essentials, which covers asset visibility, exposure management, network protection and threat detection. Claroty states that xDome covers 450+ protocols, and it uses deep packet inspection to build a detailed inventory.
- The platform groups exposures by production line, system and business purpose, so a team can focus on faults that would cause the worst operational im
- It supports micro-segmentation, with device clustering that forms zones aligned with IEC 62443.
- One limit: xDome is modular, so the price changes when you add modules beyond Essentials, and the vendor does not publish a list price.
Pros
- xDome Essentials covers asset visibility, exposure management, network protection and threat detection
- Covers 450+ protocols per the Claroty page
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- Advanced modules sit above Essentials, so full coverage costs more than the base module
Nozomi Networks Guardian
Best for: Multi-site plants that need a cloud rollup
Nozomi Networks Guardian is the on-site sensor line, and Vantage is the cloud layer that pulls Guardian, Guardian Air and Arc sensor data into one view. Guardian sensors sit on a mirror port or tap, learn a behaviour baseline from network traffic, and flag anomalous traffic and unusual process values. Vantage aggregates that data across sites, with risk scoring that can be tuned to how an organisation calculates risk.
- A local Guardian keeps working when a site is isolated, while Vantage gives a central team a view across every connected site.
- Vantage IQ adds AI-driven analytics in the cloud, and threat intelligence feeds are distilled into threat cards.
- One limit: the vendor does not publish a price, and the total is driven by asset count and the Vantage bundle, so a quote must state the asset band.
Pros
- Vantage aggregates Guardian, Guardian Air and Arc sensor data in one cloud view
- Subscription model with unlimited sensors per the Vantage page
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- On-premises consoles can hit capacity limits as sensor counts grow
Dragos Platform
Best for: Industrial control system operators
Dragos Platform is built for industrial control systems and OT networks, with a focus on visibility, vulnerability management, threat detection and response. It monitors 600+ ICS protocols natively, using both active and passive collection, and it analyses protocols, network traffic, data historians, host logs and asset data. That protocol depth is the core difference from a general IT security tool, which may see a controller as an unknown device.
- Dragos uses a Now, Next, Never framework to turn vulnerability risk into operational impact.
- Dragos states that only 3 to 6 percent of OT vulnerabilities require immediate action, so the framework helps a small team focus on faults that threat
- The platform also offers expert-authored response playbooks and AI-assisted investigation.
- One limit: there is no published price, and deployment needs sensors, a SiteStore and a CentralStore.
Pros
- Monitors 600+ ICS protocols natively
- Now, Next, Never framework focuses urgent action on a small share of vulnerabilities
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- On-premises sensors and SiteStores add hardware planning
Microsoft Defender for IoT
Best for: Microsoft 365 shops with enterprise IoT devices
Microsoft Defender for IoT is the clearest priced option in this list. The Microsoft pricing page lists the enterprise IoT device license add-on at $0.85 per device per month with an annual commitment. It is an add-on for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint P2, licensed per enterprise IoT device.
- The same page states that Defender for IoT for enterprise is included with Microsoft 365 E5, with up to five enterprise IoT devices protected per user
- The platform offers agentless network detection and response across diverse IoT, OT and industrial control system devices, and it works with Microsoft
- That link to Sentinel is the main reason to choose it if your team already runs Microsoft security.
- One limit: the $0.85 figure is the enterprise IoT device add-on, not a single price for every OT deployment.
Pros
- Included with Microsoft 365 E5, up to five eIoT devices per user license
- Add-on license is $0.85 per device per month with annual commitment
Cons
- Add-on needs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint P2
- Enterprise IoT cover is licensed per device, so a large fleet scales the monthly total
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Best for: Teams already running Palo Alto firewalls
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is designed to sit on the firewall estate a team already runs. The vendor page states that you enable IoT Security on the ML-Powered Next-Generation Firewall within minutes, with no configuration changes and no new network infrastructure. It uses machine learning and App-ID technology to identify and classify IoT and OT devices, including devices that have never been seen before.
- Palo Alto states that 30 percent of most enterprises are made up of unmanaged IoT and OT devices.
- Once devices are identified, the platform assesses risk, applies automated policy enforcement with a Device-ID policy construct, and uses Next-Generat
- Deployment covers PA-Series physical firewalls, VM-Series virtual firewalls and Prisma Access.
- That firewall link is both the strength and the limit: a team with Palo Alto firewalls can add IoT cover without a new sensor estate.
Pros
- Enables on ML-Powered Next-Generation Firewall with no new network infrastructure per the vendor page
- Machine learning identifies devices by model and operating system
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- Needs a Palo Alto firewall, so it is not a standalone choice for other firewall estates
Forescout Vistaro Platform
Best for: Hospitals and plants with unmanaged devices
Forescout Vistaro Platform starts with eyeSight, which discovers, classifies and assesses every connected asset, managed or unmanaged, across IT, OT, IoT and medical devices. The vendor page states that eyeSight uses over 30 passive and active monitoring techniques, so it can find devices that never run an agent and never appear in a standard IT inventory. That matters in hospitals, where medical devices cannot be touched, and in plants, where controllers sit outside normal IT management.
- The wider platform adds eyeInspect for OT and air-gapped environments, with deep packet inspection of 350+ industrial protocols and thousands of OT-sp
- One limit: the platform is sold in bundles with different module mixes, so a buyer must check which bundle includes segmentation, cloud management and
Pros
- eyeSight uses over 30 passive and active monitoring techniques
- eyeInspect covers 350+ OT and ICS protocols with deep packet inspection
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- Segmentation and other modules are separate offerings, so the base view does not cover every control
Tenable One OT Exposure
Best for: Teams that want IT and OT exposure in one view
Tenable One OT Exposure is the OT part of the Tenable One exposure management platform, built for converged OT and IT environments. It builds a complete inventory of OT, IoT and IT assets, including dormant programmable logic controllers, shadow IT and unmanaged IoT devices. It uses Safe Active Query to uncover firmware, backplane details, lifecycle data and known vulnerabilities, using vendor-approved methods in native protocols.
- The platform prioritises findings by real-world threat intelligence, exploitability and business impact, rather than by severity alone.
- Tenable states that its Vulnerability Priority Rating uses data science to measure real-world exploitability, while CVSS measures theoretical severity
- It also monitors configuration changes and anomalies in real time, and maps posture to NERC CIP, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS and IEC 62443.
- One limit: Tenable does not publish a price for OT Exposure, and licensing is asset-based, so the quote must state the asset count.
Pros
- Safe Active Query checks firmware and lifecycle data without disrupting operations
- Vulnerability Priority Rating measures real-world exploitability, not only CVSS severity
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- Asset-based licensing means the total rises with the asset count
How we chose
We chose providers with a named IoT or OT security product, an official product page opened on 2026-11-12, and a real deployment model for devices that cannot run an agent. We checked official pricing pages, and we wrote quote only where the vendor page showed no price. We did not test any tool hands-on, and we did not install any product. Prices and plan limits here come from official vendor pages opened on 2026-11-12. We did not use customer counts, awards or review scores to rank items. The unique angle is the Microsoft licensing split, the only published per-device price here.
Which provider fits your size and budget
| Situation | Pick first | Why it fits | Price to plan around |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft shop, under 500 enterprise IoT devices | Microsoft Defender for IoT | Published per-device price and E5 inclusion | $0.85 per device per month, annual commitment |
| Large mixed IT, OT and IoT estate | Armis Centrix | Agentless discovery across IT, OT, IoT and medical devices | quote only, by asset count |
| Industrial CPS, cloud first | Claroty xDome | xDome Essentials plus 450+ protocols | quote only, by site and asset count |
| Multi-site plant, cloud rollup | Nozomi Networks Guardian | Vantage aggregates Guardian, Guardian Air and Arc data | quote only, by asset band |
| ICS operator, protocol depth first | Dragos Platform | 600+ ICS protocols and Now, Next, Never triage | quote only, by site and sensor count |
| Palo Alto firewall estate | Palo Alto Networks IoT Security | Enables on the existing firewall | quote only, by firewall and device count |
| Hospital or plant, unmanaged devices | Forescout Vistaro Platform | eyeSight with over 30 discovery techniques | quote only, by device count |
| IT and OT in one exposure view | Tenable One OT Exposure | Safe Active Query plus Vulnerability Priority Rating | quote only, by asset count |
Frequently asked questions
Which is the best IoT security provider for most teams?
Microsoft Defender for IoT is the best pick for most Microsoft teams, because it has a published price of $0.85 per device per month with an annual commitment, and it is included with Microsoft 365 E5 for up to five enterprise IoT devices per user license. Armis Centrix is the better default for large mixed estates.
How much does IoT security cost?
The only published price in this list is Microsoft Defender for IoT at $0.85 per device per month with an annual commitment, which is $85 per month or $1,020 per year for 100 devices. The other seven providers do not publish a price, so expect a quote based on asset count, site count and modules.
Which provider is best for industrial plants?
Dragos Platform is best for industrial control system operators that need protocol depth, with 600+ ICS protocols monitored natively and a Now, Next, Never framework for triage. Claroty xDome is a strong cloud alternative, with 450+ protocols and xDome Essentials as the base module.
Which provider is best for hospitals?
Forescout Vistaro Platform is a strong fit for hospitals, because eyeSight discovers managed and unmanaged assets across IT, OT, IoT and medical devices without an agent, using over 30 passive and active techniques. Armis Centrix is also built for medical devices, with agentless discovery and prioritisation by device criticality.
Do any of these providers offer a free plan?
No provider in this list offers a free plan. Microsoft Defender for IoT is included with Microsoft 365 E5 for up to five enterprise IoT devices per user license, which is the closest thing to a no-extra-cost start here, but it still needs a Microsoft 365 E5 licence.
What should I check before I sign a quote?
Check the meter, the asset count, the sites covered, the modules included and the hardware needed. Ask whether segmentation, threat detection and cloud management are in the base price, and ask for onboarding and support costs in the first-year total.
Sources
- https://www.armis.com/platform/armis-centrix-for-ot-iot-security/
- https://claroty.com/industrial-cybersecurity/xdome
- https://www.nozominetworks.com/platform/vantage
- https://www.dragos.com/cybersecurity-platform/
- https://www.microsoft.com/security/business/endpoint-security/microsoft-defender-iot-pricing
- https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/static/content/pan/en_US/network-security/iot-security.html
- https://www.forescout.com/product/
- https://www.tenable.com/products/tenable-ot
Prices and features were read on each company’s own website in November 2026. They change often, so confirm the current offer on the official site before you sign up or buy.