Enverus PRISM is the best oil and gas benchmarking analytics platform for most large evaluation teams, because it pairs well-level forecasts with peer benchmarking and cash flow modelling in one workspace, while WellDatabase is the default pick when you want a published price and a self-serve start. Only WellDatabase publishes a starting price on its pricing page, at $250 per user per month when billed annually, and its Lite plan costs $0, so every other platform in this list needs a sales quote before you can budget it. A useful unique fact is that Enverus PRISM works from data covering more than 5.4 million North American wells, which is why its peer comparisons can run at basin scale rather than on a small sample of wells.
Benchmarking in oil and gas means comparing your wells, costs, and inventory against peers on the same basis, with the same type curves, spacing assumptions, and price decks. A good platform gives you clean well data, a forecast you can defend, and a way to test what happens when prices or costs move. Prices come from official vendor pricing pages opened on 2026-11-12, and where a vendor hides its price we write quote only.
On this page
Best oil and gas benchmarking analytics platform: comparison table
Swipe the table sideways on a phone to see every column.
| # | Name | Best for | Starting price | Free plan / trial | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enverus PRISM | Large evaluation and acquisition teams | quote only | No | Visit |
| 2 | WellDatabase | Self-serve well data with a published price | $250 per user/month | Yes | Visit |
| 3 | Novi Labs | Machine learning well forecasts | quote only | No | Visit |
| 4 | Rystad Energy | Global upstream benchmarking | quote only | No | Visit |
| 5 | Wood Mackenzie Lens | Cross-commodity asset valuation | quote only | No | Visit |
| 6 | Quorum Software | Connected upstream operations | quote only | No | Visit |
| 7 | TetraSoft Atlas | Cross-state public record screens | quote only | Free trial (7 days) | Visit |
| 8 | DrillingEdge | Low-cost well lookup by area | quote only | No | Visit |
The 8 best best oil and gas benchmarking analytics platforms, in detail
Enverus PRISM
Best for: Large evaluation and acquisition teams
Enverus PRISM brings together well data, analyst research, and your own proprietary data in a single workspace. Teams use it to screen acquisition targets, run scenario analysis, model cash flows, and compare an asset against peers in the same play. The platform covers spacing, geology, and economics across plays, and it lets you customise type curves and view scenarios in seconds.
- The trade-off is access.
- Enverus does not publish a price for PRISM, so you must request a quote and agree the modules and basins your contract covers.
- A team that only needs a handful of wells in one county will find the enterprise sales process slow.
- A team that evaluates assets across basins or needs defensible inventory for a board paper will get more from PRISM than from a lookup tool.
Pros
- Well-level forecasts and peer benchmarking in one platform
- inventory and cash flow models built on analyst-curated data
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- enterprise scope can be more than a small team needs
WellDatabase
Best for: Self-serve well data with a published price
WellDatabase is a data platform built on public well records for the United States and Western Canada, with permits, completions, frac data, and monthly production on a well-by-well basis. The pricing page lists four plans. Lite costs $0 per user per month.
- Essential costs $250 per user per month when billed annually, or $300 when billed monthly.
- Plus costs $500 per user per month when billed annually, or $600 monthly.
- Pro costs $1,000 per user per month when billed annually, or $1,200 monthly.
- All plans include all states and Canada.
Pros
- Published prices from $0 Lite to $1,000 Pro per user per month
- export limits rise with each plan, from 5,000 to 50,000 wells per month
Cons
- Essential plan at $250 per user per month limits exports to 5,000 wells per month
- advanced analytics sit in higher plans
Novi Labs
Best for: Machine learning well forecasts
Novi Labs builds forecasts with machine learning models that account for rock quality, spacing interference, and depletion, rather than relying on fixed type curve averages. Its platform lets engineers generate scenario-driven forecasts for individual wells and pads, build drill schedules, and run PDP and PUD valuations without writing code. Novi EVA extends that work into Canada, with well-level forecasts across the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and monthly engineer review of more than 190,000 forecasts.
- The strength here is forecast quality at speed.
- A team can test thousands of scenarios in hours, compare development plans, and value mineral interests with production data that is updated as new we
- The limit is commercial transparency.
- Novi does not publish a price, so you must ask for a quote and confirm which basins and forecast modules are included.
Pros
- No-code machine learning forecasts for thousands of wells in hours
- more than 190,000 well forecasts reviewed monthly by engineers
Cons
- No published price, so costs need a sales quote
- forecasting depth suits teams that already work with type curves and economics
Rystad Energy
Best for: Global upstream benchmarking
Rystad Energy UCube is a well-by-well upstream database that reconciles historical and future exploration and production activity across countries, companies, and fields. Teams use it to benchmark performance between operators, compare production, reserves, and economics at country, company, or field level, and study trends in drilling activity and well level production. The wider Rystad platform adds data feeds, dashboards, and analyst commentary, with delivery through its Cube browsers and integrations with tools such as Snowflake and Azure.
- Rystad suits global teams, banks, and investors who must compare assets across borders on one consistent basis.
- A North American operator that only works in one basin may find the global coverage wider than it needs, and the price will reflect that breadth.
- Ask which cubes, regions, and data feeds your licence covers, because upstream, gas and LNG, and service market data are separate products.
Pros
- Well-by-well upstream database covering global exploration and production
- benchmarks for production growth, costs, and exploration success
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- global scope can exceed the needs of a single-basin team
Wood Mackenzie Lens
Best for: Cross-commodity asset valuation
Wood Mackenzie Lens connects asset, market, and supply chain intelligence in one workflow, so deal teams can screen and value upstream assets with the same assumptions they use for gas, power, and metals. Lens Upstream is the anchor for valuation and deal modelling, built from bottom-up, operator-sourced data covering 5,600 plus assets, 280,000 plus offshore facilities, and 250 plus fiscal regimes. Teams can model asset economics, stress-test pricing, and build a cross-commodity view for an investment committee.
- The platform is built for mandates where the valuation must hold up in front of clients and investment committees.
- That strength comes with an enterprise buying process and no published price, so a small team should expect a sales cycle and an implementation discus
- Lens suits advisors, large operators, and investors who run upstream deals alongside gas, power, or metals work.
Pros
- Lens Upstream valuation with 5,600 plus assets and 250 plus fiscal regimes
- consistent assumptions across upstream, gas, power, and metals
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- enterprise platform with a sales-led buying process
Quorum Software
Best for: Connected upstream operations
Quorum Software runs connected energy operations from the field to the boardroom, with products for hydrocarbon accounting, production allocation, land, planning, and reserves. Its Energy Components platform tracks hydrocarbons from the wellhead through delivery and commercial settlement, and it is available as a fully managed cloud service with SOC 2 Type 2 certification and a 99.5 percent availability service level. Quorum says its solutions are used across more than 30 countries and manage a large share of world hydrocarbons.
- Quorum is a strong fit when benchmarking must sit beside operations, accounting, and planning, rather than in a standalone research tool.
- A team can compare actual production and allocation data against plan inside the same system that records it.
- The limit is that Quorum is an enterprise suite with quote-based pricing and implementation work, so it is not a quick self-serve purchase.
- Ask which modules are included and how many countries and assets the licence covers before you compare its cost with a data-only platform.
Pros
- Integrated hydrocarbon accounting and production allocation across more than 30 countries
- cloud delivery with a 99.5 percent availability service level
Cons
- No published price, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- operations focus means it is not a pure benchmarking database
TetraSoft Atlas
Best for: Cross-state public record screens
TetraSoft Atlas brings public well, production, emissions, and enforcement records onto one map for cross-state screens. The vendor describes it as a self-serve monthly subscription with a 7-day free trial and no sales call needed to start. It suits analysts, operators, and consultants who need to screen wells across the eight states that together produce most United States oil and gas, and who want to test the tool on real wells before they commit.
- The key check is coverage.
- Atlas covers eight major producing states, so wells outside those states need another source.
- That limit is also its strength, because the data is structured for cross-state comparison rather than single-state lookup.
- Before you subscribe, run your own test on 20 wells you know well, check which fields come back filled, and confirm the monthly price at signup, since
Pros
- Self-serve monthly subscription with a 7-day free trial
- public well, production, emissions, and enforcement records on one map
Cons
- No published price on the pages we opened, so the monthly cost needs a check at signup
- coverage focuses on eight major producing states
DrillingEdge
Best for: Low-cost well lookup by area
DrillingEdge is a data service for upstream oil and gas that covers wells, operators, leases, permits, and production across 21 states in the United States. Its pricing is structured by area, with county access, statewide access, and nationwide access plans, so a team can buy only the geography it works in. That area-based model keeps the cost down for a team that works in one or two counties and does not need global research.
- The platform is best for quick checks and routine lookup, not for building machine learning forecasts or running full asset valuations.
- A landman, small operator, or consultant who needs to find wells and production fast will get value from it.
- A team that needs type curves, decline analysis, or peer benchmarking should pair it with a forecasting platform or choose WellDatabase, which publish
- Confirm the county, state, or nationwide price at signup, since the pages we opened did not show a current number.
Pros
- Plans by county, state, or nationwide access
- simple lookup for wells, operators, leases, permits, and production
Cons
- No published price on the pages we opened, so the cost needs a check at signup
- lookup focus means weaker forecasting than Novi Labs or Enverus PRISM
How we chose
We only included platforms with real well, production, or asset data and a named benchmarking or forecasting workflow, and we checked official vendor pages and pricing pages opened on 2026-11-12. Prices and plan limits in this article come from those official pages. Where a vendor showed no price, we wrote quote only rather than estimating a number. We did not test any tool hands-on. We did not install any product, and we did not use customer counts, awards, or review scores to rank the items. The order reflects fit for the benchmarking job, from broad evaluation platforms to focused lookup tools.
Which platform fits your team size and budget
| Team and budget | Best pick | Why it fits | Cost to confirm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solo analyst, under $300 per month | WellDatabase Essential | Published price, self-serve signup | $250 per user/month (billed annually) |
| Small team, one basin | DrillingEdge or TetraSoft Atlas | Area-based access, low entry cost | Quote at signup, 7-day trial for Atlas |
| Mid-size operator, forecasting often | Novi Labs | Machine learning forecasts, no code needed | Sales quote, basins and modules vary |
| Large evaluation team | Enverus PRISM | Peer benchmarking plus cash flow models | Sales quote, modules and basins vary |
| Global team or investor | Rystad Energy or Wood Mackenzie Lens | Country and company level comparison | Sales quote, regions and feeds vary |
| Operator needing accounting too | Quorum Software | Hydrocarbon accounting beside analytics | Sales quote, modules and countries vary |
Frequently asked questions
Which oil and gas benchmarking platform is best for most teams?
Enverus PRISM is the best pick for most large evaluation teams, because it combines well-level forecasts, peer benchmarking, and cash flow modelling in one workspace. WellDatabase is the better pick for a small team that wants a published price and a self-serve start, with Essential at $250 per user per month when billed annually and a Lite plan at $0.
What is the cheapest platform with a published price?
WellDatabase is the cheapest platform here with a published price. Its Lite plan costs $0 per user per month, and Essential costs $250 per user per month when billed annually. Every other platform in this list hides its price behind a sales quote, so you cannot budget it without asking the vendor.
Does Enverus PRISM cover enough wells for basin-scale benchmarking?
Yes. Enverus PRISM works from data covering more than 5.4 million North American wells, which lets teams compare assets at basin scale and test inventory, spacing, and economics across plays. That breadth is why it suits acquisition screening and capital planning rather than single-well lookup.
Which platform is best for machine learning forecasts?
Novi Labs is the best pick for machine learning forecasts. Its no-code platform generates scenario-driven forecasts for thousands of wells in hours, and its engineers review more than 190,000 well forecasts monthly. It suits operators and investors who reforecast often and need to test spacing, depletion, and rock quality effects.
Can I try a platform before I buy?
Yes, for two of the eight. WellDatabase offers a Lite plan at $0 per user per month, and TetraSoft Atlas offers a 7-day free trial with self-serve signup. The enterprise platforms, including Enverus PRISM, Rystad Energy, and Wood Mackenzie Lens, work through demos and sales quotes rather than a free trial.
What should I check before I sign a contract?
Check the basins and regions covered, the number of user seats, the monthly export limit, and whether forecasting and API access are included. WellDatabase shows the export limit clearly, with 5,000 wells per month on Essential and 50,000 on Pro, while the quote-based vendors need each of those items confirmed in writing.
Sources
- https://www.enverus.com
- https://www.enverus.com/solutions/evaluate-acquire-divest/
- https://welldatabase.com
- https://welldatabase.com/pricing
- https://novilabs.com
- https://novilabs.com/energy-analytics/
- https://www.rystadenergy.com
- https://www.rystadenergy.com/data-and-analytics
- https://www.woodmac.com
- https://www.woodmac.com/es/lens/
- https://www.quorumsoftware.com
- https://www.quorumsoftware.com/solutions/global-upstream/
- https://tetrasoftco.com
- https://tetrasoftco.com/blog/oil-and-gas-data-analytics-platform/
- https://www.drillingedge.com
Prices and features were read on each company’s own website in November 2026. They change often, so confirm the current offer on the official site before you sign up or buy.