Best Qualitative Data Analysis Software

  • Last updated November 13, 2026
  • 8 options compared
  • Prices checked on official sites
Quick answer

NVivo is the best qualitative data analysis software for most academic researchers, because it handles interviews, surveys, audio, video and mixed methods data in one desktop project, with matrix coding queries, cases and attributes, and a student subscription from $130 per year. If your budget is tight, Quirkos starts at $5 per month for students and Taguette costs $0, while Dedoose charges only for the months you log in, at $12.95 per active month for students and $17.95 for individuals. Lumivero now owns both NVivo and ATLAS.ti, so MAXQDA is the main independent desktop qualitative analysis vendor left, which matters if vendor independence is part of your buying decision.

Qualitative data analysis software, often called QDA or CAQDAS software, helps you code interview transcripts, survey answers, documents, audio and video, then find patterns across the coded material. The right choice depends on how much data you hold, whether you work alone or in a team, and whether your institution already holds a site license. Prices and plan limits come from official vendor pages opened on 2026-11-12.

On this page
  1. Comparison table
  2. 1. NVivo
  3. 2. MAXQDA
  4. 3. ATLAS.ti
  5. 4. Dedoose
  6. 5. Quirkos
  7. 6. Dovetail
  8. 7. Taguette
  9. 8. QDA Miner
  10. How we chose
  11. Pick by budget and team size
  12. FAQ
  13. Sources

Best qualitative data analysis software: comparison table

Swipe the table sideways on a phone to see every column.

#NameBest forStarting priceFree plan / trialLink
1NVivoAcademic researchers with large mixed methods projects$130 per yearFree trial (14 days)Visit
2MAXQDAMixed methods researchers who want one identical app on Windows and Mac€88 per yearFree trial (14 days)Visit
3ATLAS.tiResearchers who want desktop, Mac and web in one license$130 per yearFree trialVisit
4DedooseSmall teams coding together in a browser$12.95 per active monthFree trialVisit
5QuirkosBeginners and students who want visual coding$5 per monthFree trial (14 days)Visit
6DovetailProduct and UX teams synthesising interview notes$0 per monthYesVisit
7TaguetteStudents and small teams with no budget$0YesVisit
8QDA MinerWindows researchers who want computer assisted codingquote onlyYes (QDA Miner Lite)Visit

The 8 best best qualitative data analysis software tools, in detail

1

NVivo

Best for: Academic researchers with large mixed methods projects

NVivo is the reference point for qualitative data analysis software, and it earns that place through depth rather than simplicity. You import documents, transcripts, surveys, audio and video into one desktop workspace, code them by hand, organise participants through cases and attributes, and run queries and matrices that show how themes differ across groups. The price range on the official Lumivero product page runs from $130 to $2,327.50, and the $130 figure is the student subscription for 12 months.

Pricing$130 per year (student subscription)
Free plan / trialFree trial (14 days)
  • Academic subscriptions cost $520 per year and commercial subscriptions cost $1,005 per year, based on the Lumivero shop list.
  • Choose NVivo when your project is large or your university already supports it.
  • Skip it when you only code a handful of interviews.

Pros

  • Handles text, audio, video, surveys and social media in one project
  • matrix coding queries, cases and attributes for cross-group comparison
  • 14-day free trial

Cons

  • No free plan
  • Collaboration Cloud and transcription are extra-cost add-ons
  • commercial subscription costs far more than the $130 student rate

Visit NVivo →

2

MAXQDA

Best for: Mixed methods researchers who want one identical app on Windows and Mac

MAXQDA, sold by VERBI Software in Berlin, is the friendliest of the three classic desktop QDA programs, and it is the only leading one that is 100 percent identical on Windows and Mac. It codes text, audio, video, surveys and geodata, and its MAXMaps visual tools link qualitative codes to quantitative variables without a separate statistics program. The official pricing page lists a verified student license at €50 for six months or €88 for twelve months, an academic annual subscription at €242 per seat, and a business annual subscription at €550 per seat.

Pricing€88 per year (student license, 12 months)
Free plan / trialFree trial (14 days)
Websitemaxqda.com
  • MAXQDA Analytics Pro, which adds the MAXDictio text analysis module and the Stats module, costs €275 per year for academics.
  • One limit: TeamCloud collaboration is capped at 5 users per license and is sold separately.
  • Choose MAXQDA when you want deep mixed methods analysis with a gentler learning curve than NVivo.
  • Skip it when you need real-time multi-user editing inside one live project file.

Pros

  • Identical interface and features on Windows and Mac
  • strong mixed methods tools including MAXMaps visuals
  • AI Assist Free included at no cost

Cons

  • No free plan
  • AI Assist Premium and TeamCloud collaboration are extra-cost add-ons
  • exact prices appear only in the shop checkout for some buyers

Visit MAXQDA →

3

ATLAS.ti

Best for: Researchers who want desktop, Mac and web in one license

ATLAS.ti has been a core QDA tool since 1993, and its current selling point is simple: one Desktop and Web license includes access to all features and all platforms, Windows, Mac and web, so you can start coding on a laptop and continue in a browser. The vendor shop lists a personal student license at $130 for one year or $71 for six months, an educational seat at $387 per year, and a commercial seat at $722 per year, with prices shown net of tax. Web-only monthly licenses are cheaper, at $14 a month for students and $65 a month for commercial users, but they exclude the desktop apps.

Pricing$130 per year (student license)
Free plan / trialFree trial
  • One limit: after three years the license converts to an annual renewal.
  • Choose ATLAS.ti when you move between desktop and browser often.
  • Skip it when your institution already holds an NVivo site license.

Pros

  • One license covers Windows, Mac and web with all features
  • network views show links between codes and quotations
  • student license at $130 for one year

Cons

  • No free plan
  • the vendor pricing page itself returns an error and prices sit in the shop
  • commercial seat costs $722 per year

Visit ATLAS.ti →

4

Dedoose

Best for: Small teams coding together in a browser

Dedoose is the most affordable way for a small team to code together without installing desktop software. It runs in a browser, so every coder sees the same project, and it covers qualitative coding plus quantitative descriptor data in one place, which suits mixed methods studies that pair interview excerpts with survey numbers. The official pricing page lists $12.95 per active month for students, $17.95 per active month for individuals, $15.95 per user per active month for small groups of 2 to 5 users, and $13.95 per user per month for large groups of 6 or more.

Pricing$12.95 per active month (student)
Free plan / trialFree trial
  • The key detail is the word active: Dedoose charges individual and small group accounts only for the months in which a user logs in, so a project that
  • Choose Dedoose when your team works in different places and your project runs in bursts.
  • Skip it when you need offline desktop coding.

Pros

  • Runs fully in a browser with nothing to install
  • you only pay for months you log in
  • real-time collaboration and mixed methods charts included in every plan

Cons

  • No free plan
  • audio and video storage above the included amount costs extra
  • no native transcription, so recordings must be transcribed elsewhere first

Visit Dedoose →

5

Quirkos

Best for: Beginners and students who want visual coding

Quirkos is the easiest QDA tool on this list to learn, and that is its whole point. Codes appear as coloured bubbles that grow as you add material, so a new researcher can see the shape of a project at a glance, and the vendor says most users learn it in about 20 minutes. The official licences page lists $5 per month for students, $13 per month for academic and nonprofit users, $17 per month for public sector users, and $23 per month for commercial users, with annual rates saving 38 percent for students and 12 percent for academics.

Pricing$5 per month (student)
Free plan / trialFree trial (14 days)
  • A 14-day free trial includes the full version plus 100 minutes of automated transcription.
  • The offline student licence is permanent, with no need to upgrade to a higher rate after graduation.
  • Choose Quirkos for a first thesis, a small team, or a teaching course.
  • Skip it when your analysis needs advanced matrix queries.

Pros

  • Visual bubble interface that new coders learn fast
  • offline student licences are permanent with no upgrade after graduation
  • 100 minutes of transcription free with a trial

Cons

  • No free plan
  • fewer advanced query and analysis features than NVivo or MAXQDA
  • offline collaboration means sending project files back and forth

Visit Quirkos →

6

Dovetail

Best for: Product and UX teams synthesising interview notes

Dovetail is built for product and UX research teams rather than academic theses. It stores interview transcripts, session notes and survey responses in one searchable repository, tags them, and uses AI chat and summaries to turn raw notes into themes and reports. The official pricing page lists two options: a Free plan at $0 with no card required, covering 1 channel, 1 project and 1 dashboard with basic AI chat and summaries, and an Enterprise plan with custom pricing.

Pricing$0 per month (Free plan)
Free plan / trialYes
  • Dovetail removed its self-serve Professional plan, previously listed near $15 to $29 per user per month.
  • One limit: the Free plan holds only one project, so a team running several studies at once outgrows it fast.
  • Choose Dovetail when your team synthesises customer interviews every week.
  • Skip it when you need classic academic coding.

Pros

  • Free plan at $0 with no card required
  • AI chat and summaries inside a single project
  • unlimited projects, channels and agents on Enterprise

Cons

  • Enterprise pricing is quote only with no published per-seat price
  • Free plan is limited to 1 project and 1 channel
  • credit overages cost $0.15 each

Visit Dovetail →

7

Taguette

Best for: Students and small teams with no budget

Taguette is the free, open source option for researchers who need core coding and nothing else. You import documents in PDF, Word, plain text or HTML, highlight passages, give each one a tag, and export the coded material. You can use the hosted app in a browser or run it on your own server.

Pricing$0 (free open source)
Free plan / trialYes
  • The price is $0, since Taguette is released under the BSD-3-Clause open source licence, and there is no subscription tier to upgrade to.
  • Several people can work on one project when it runs on a shared server, and different permission levels let you control who can edit.
  • One limit: Taguette only handles text, and all coding is manual, so it cannot transcribe audio or code video.
  • Choose Taguette for a thesis, a pilot study, or a small text-only project with no budget.

Pros

  • Completely free and open source with no licence cost
  • runs on your own computer, on your own server, or on the hosted app
  • collaborators can share one project on a server

Cons

  • Text only, with no audio or video coding
  • no AI features
  • no published security details for the hosted app

Visit Taguette →

8

QDA Miner

Best for: Windows researchers who want computer assisted coding

QDA Miner, from Provalis Research in Canada, is a Windows desktop program for coding, annotating, retrieving and analysing collections of documents and images. Its strongest claim is computer-assisted coding: it suggests codes, finds similar passages, and runs statistical tests such as Chi-Square and Pearson correlation inside the same program. The full version price is not published on the vendor site, so the starting price is quote only, and pricing depends on whether you are in academia, government or the private sector.

Pricingquote only
Free plan / trialYes (QDA Miner Lite)
  • QDA Miner Lite is a free version for basic text and image coding, and a 14-day trial of the full version is available.
  • One limit: QDA Miner Lite is a Windows application, and Lite projects cannot be merged.
  • Choose QDA Miner when you code on Windows and want the most automation in manual coding.
  • Skip it when your team works on Mac.

Pros

  • More computer assistance for coding than most rivals, including automated coding suggestions
  • free Lite version for basic text and image coding
  • GenAI document analysis with a choice of AI engines

Cons

  • Full version price is not published on the vendor site, so you must request a quote
  • Windows only, with no native Mac version
  • Lite projects cannot be merged or imported into a trial version

Visit QDA Miner →

How we chose

We included only real qualitative data analysis tools with a published product page and a real coding workflow, and we excluded general survey tools and note apps that do not code data. Prices and plan limits come from official vendor pricing pages and product pages opened on 2026-11-12. Where a vendor hid the price, we wrote quote only. We did not test any tool hands-on, and we did not install or use any of them. We ranked nothing by customer counts, awards or review scores. The unique fact in this article is that Lumivero now owns both NVivo and ATLAS.ti, which leaves MAXQDA as the main independent desktop QDA vendor.

Pick by budget and team size

Situation Best pick Cost to start
Solo student, no budget Taguette $0
Solo student, visual coding Quirkos student $5 per month
Solo student, classic desktop QDA NVivo student or ATLAS.ti student $130 per year
Academic researcher, mixed methods MAXQDA academic €242 per year
Small team, browser only, project runs in bursts Dedoose small group $15.95 per user per active month
Product team, one study at a time Dovetail Free $0 per month
Windows researcher, wants automation QDA Miner Lite, then quote for full version $0 to start
Large academic team, 10 or more seats NVivo or ATLAS.ti through vendor sales quote only

Frequently asked questions

What is the best qualitative data analysis software for a PhD student?

NVivo is the best choice for most PhD students, because most universities teach it, supervisors know it, and the student subscription costs $130 per year with a 14-day free trial. Quirkos at $5 per month is easier to learn, and Taguette costs $0 if your project is text only.

How much does qualitative data analysis software cost?

Prices run from $0 for Taguette and Dovetail Free to $130 per year for a student NVivo or ATLAS.ti license, €242 per year for an academic MAXQDA seat, and $722 per year for a commercial ATLAS.ti seat. Dedoose charges $12.95 per active month for students, and Quirkos charges $5 per month for students.

Which qualitative data analysis software is free?

Taguette is free and open source, QDA Miner Lite is a free version for basic coding, and Dovetail has a Free plan at $0 for one project and one channel. NVivo, MAXQDA, ATLAS.ti, Dedoose and Quirkos have no free plan, only a free trial.

Which is best for a small research team?

Dedoose is the best pick for a small team that works in a browser, because it charges $15.95 per user per active month for groups of 2 to 5 users and only bills for months in which a user logs in.

Is NVivo or MAXQDA better for mixed methods research?

Both handle mixed methods well, but MAXQDA is the stronger pick when your team mixes Windows and Mac, since its interface and features are identical on both. NVivo is the stronger pick when you need matrix coding queries and cases across large datasets, or when your institution already holds an NVivo site license.

What happened to ATLAS.ti ownership?

Lumivero, the company that owns NVivo, also owns ATLAS.ti now, so the two biggest desktop QDA tools share one owner. MAXQDA remains independent, sold by VERBI Software in Berlin. If vendor independence matters to your institution, that fact alone can decide between ATLAS.ti and MAXQDA.

Sources

Prices and features were read on each company’s own website in November 2026. They change often, so confirm the current offer on the official site before you sign up or buy.