SOC 2 reporting software prepares evidence, tracks controls, and builds the audit package, but only a licensed CPA firm can issue the SOC 2 report. Secureframe is the only tool here with a starting price shown on its own pricing page, at $7,500 per year for Fundamentals. Vanta, Drata, Sprinto, Thoropass, Scytale, Optro, and Hyperproof all use quote only pricing on the pages checked on 2026-11-12.
We compared 8 options for top soc 2 reporting software comparison. Each profile below lists the price, free plan, pros and cons as published by the company.
On this page
Top soc 2 reporting software comparison: comparison table
Swipe the table sideways on a phone to see every column.
| # | Name | Best for | Starting price | Free plan / trial | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vanta | Startups that want one framework first | quote only | No | Visit |
| 2 | Drata | Engineering led teams up to 50 staff | quote only | No | Visit |
| 3 | Secureframe | Small teams that want a published entry price | $7,500 per year | No | Visit |
| 4 | Sprinto | Cost conscious SaaS teams | quote only | No | Visit |
| 5 | Thoropass | Teams that want software and audit in one place | quote only | No | Visit |
| 6 | Scytale | Growing teams under 150 staff | quote only | No | Visit |
| 7 | Optro (formerly AuditBoard) | Large teams with broad GRC needs | quote only | No | Visit |
| 8 | Hyperproof | Teams that want compliance, risk, and security in one system | quote only | No | Visit |
The 8 best top soc 2 reporting software comparisons, in detail
Vanta
Best for: Startups that want one framework first
Vanta is a trust management platform that helps a team collect evidence, monitor controls, and prepare for a SOC 2 audit. The Essentials plan includes one compliance framework, an agentic policy generator, automated evidence collection, basic reporting and audit workflows, continuous controls monitoring, an Auditor API, and a Trust Center. Plus adds questionnaire automation with 25 questionnaires per year, while Professional adds 144 questionnaires per year, risk management, and advanced reporting.
- The main limit is scope.
- Essentials covers one framework, so a team that also needs ISO 27001 or HIPAA in the same year will need a higher plan or an add-on, and the price for
- Vanta asks buyers to request a demo to discuss business needs and get personalized pricing.
- Ask for the quote to name the framework, the employee band, the questionnaire allowance, and the term before you decide.
Pros
- Automated evidence collection for audit readiness
- Trust Center and Auditor API included in Essentials
Cons
- Essentials covers one compliance framework only
- No price is shown on the pricing page, so a demo and quote are needed
Drata
Best for: Engineering led teams up to 50 staff
Drata is a governance, risk, and compliance platform that automates evidence collection and control monitoring for SOC 2 and other frameworks. The Foundation plan includes up to 50 full time staff, pre-built integrations, a standard Trust Center, standard AI questionnaire assistance, risk management, custom controls, Compliance as Code, and open API access. Advanced adds any available framework, custom connections and tests, and custom fields, while Enterprise adds risk management pro and unlimited API and webhook access.
- The reporting strength is in continuous monitoring and the way one control set can map to more than one framework.
- A team can track control status, collect evidence from connected systems, and share a Trust Center with customers.
- The limit is the entry cap.
- Foundation covers up to 50 full time staff, so a team above that line needs a higher plan, and extra frameworks are add-ons.
Pros
- Pre-built integrations and automated evidence collection
- Custom controls and Compliance as Code
Cons
- Foundation is capped at up to 50 full time staff
- No price is shown on the pricing page, so a quote is needed
Secureframe
Best for: Small teams that want a published entry price
Secureframe is a compliance automation platform that helps a team get compliant, manage risk, and build trust with customers. The Fundamentals plan starts at $7,500 per year and includes infrastructure monitoring, custom frameworks, controls, and tests, evidence collection, personnel management, risk management, policy management, and a Trust Center. Complete adds advanced third party risk management, advanced risk management, advanced user access reviews, an advanced Trust Center, advanced questionnaire automation, SSO and SCIM connections, and custom integrations.
- The reporting value is in the way evidence, policies, personnel, and risk sit in one place.
- The limit is that only Fundamentals carries a published price.
- Complete and Defense both use a get a quote button, so a team that needs advanced questionnaire automation or SSO and SCIM will not know the cost unti
- Secureframe suits a small team that wants a published starting price.
Pros
- Fundamentals starts at $7,500 per year on the pricing page
- Infrastructure monitoring, evidence collection, and Trust Center in the entry plan
Cons
- Complete and Defense show no price and need a quote
- Fundamentals is the entry plan, so advanced risk and questionnaire features need a higher plan
Sprinto
Best for: Cost conscious SaaS teams
Sprinto is a compliance automation platform built for SaaS teams that need SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and other frameworks. It connects to cloud, identity, code, and device systems, runs continuous checks mapped to the Trust Services Criteria, and holds evidence for the auditor. The platform includes policy templates, continuous monitoring, evidence collection, audit management, personnel compliance, vendor risk, risk management, and a Trust Center.
- The main drawback is pricing transparency.
- The Sprinto pricing page is password protected, so a buyer cannot see a plan list or a starting price without going through sales.
- That makes it hard to compare Sprinto with Secureframe, which publishes a $7,500 per year starting price.
- Sprinto suits a SaaS team that wants a lower cost option and is willing to get a written quote that names the framework count, the employee band, and
Pros
- Automated evidence collection across connected systems
- Policy templates and an auditor dashboard for SOC 2 work
Cons
- Pricing page is password protected and shows no price
- No free plan is listed, so buyers must go through sales
Thoropass
Best for: Teams that want software and audit in one place
Thoropass is different from most tools in this list because it combines compliance software with a licensed audit firm. The Audit Lifecycle Platform manages readiness through to the final report, with AI powered workflow automation, evidence collection, control management, and auditor collaboration in one place. The platform maps overlapping controls across frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI, GDPR, and HITRUST, so a team does not repeat the same evidence work for each framework.
- Thoropass also offers penetration testing.
- The reporting benefit is accountability.
- One vendor owns both the preparation tool and the audit, so the evidence, the auditor questions, and the final report stay in the same system.
- That can cut handover delays between a software vendor and a separate CPA firm.
Pros
- Licensed audit firm in the same vendor as the platform
- Evidence reuse across frameworks in one audit lifecycle platform
Cons
- Pricing is a tailored quote only, with no price shown
- Bundled software and audit pricing makes a platform only comparison hard
Scytale
Best for: Growing teams under 150 staff
Scytale is an AI powered security and compliance platform with three plans tied to team size. Build is for teams under 150 employees and includes automated evidence collection for audit readiness, pre-built policies and controls, risk assessment, a Trust Center, user access reviews, vendor management, open API access, and MCP support. Scale covers 150 to 1,000 employees and adds AI third party risk management, AI assisted evidence review, a customized risk program with dashboard and reporting, advanced policy approvals, an advanced Trust Center, and multi entity support.
- The size based plan structure makes shortlisting simple.
- A team under 150 staff can start with Build, and a team that crosses that line knows it will move to Scale.
- The reporting work is centered on automated evidence collection, pre-built policies, and a Trust Center, which covers the main needs for a SOC 2 repor
- The limit is price.
Pros
- Automated evidence collection for audit readiness in the Build plan
- Pre-built policies and controls plus a Trust Center
Cons
- Build is limited to teams under 150 employees
- No price is shown on the pricing page, so a demo and quote are needed
Optro (formerly AuditBoard)
Best for: Large teams with broad GRC needs
Optro, formerly AuditBoard, is a connected risk and GRC platform that links audit, risk, infosec, and compliance work in one system. The pricing page describes predictable pricing for growth, with unlimited stakeholder licenses, flexible plans, and white glove services for implementation. That design fits a large team where many people need to view risks, controls, and audit work without a per license charge for each stakeholder.
- The platform is built for teams that run SOC 2 alongside SOX, internal audit, and enterprise risk.
- The reporting strength is breadth.
- A team can connect compliance evidence to risk and audit work, and leadership can see control health in a single view.
- The limit is fit and price clarity.
Pros
- Unlimited stakeholder licenses on the pricing page
- Flexible plans that can change as GRC needs change
Cons
- Pricing page is a request form with no price shown
- Enterprise focus and white glove services may be more than a small team needs
Hyperproof
Best for: Teams that want compliance, risk, and security in one system
Hyperproof is an AI powered GRC platform that centralizes compliance, risk, and security workflows. Its compliance management module helps a team adopt new frameworks, standardize control operations across multiple frameworks, and cut duplicate work by using a common control set. The risk management module links control health data with risk registers, tracks vendors, renewal dates, and risk profiles, and gives leadership a consolidated dashboard for risk and compliance status.
- The platform also supports SSO, multi factor authentication, and role based access.
- The reporting value is in the shared control set.
- A team can run SOC 2 and other frameworks from the same controls, and report control health to leadership without building a separate report for each
- The limit is price transparency.
Pros
- Centralizes compliance, risk, and security workflows in one platform
- AI powered compliance module with a common control set across frameworks
Cons
- Pricing page shows no price or plan list
- No free plan is listed, so buyers must contact sales for a quote
How we chose
We opened each vendor pricing page on 2026-11-12 and took the starting price from that page. When the page showed no price, we wrote quote only, and when the page was password protected, as with Sprinto, we wrote quote only as well. We did not use third party price lists as the source for a starting price, and we did not invent a price for any tool. We checked plan names, feature lists, employee bands, and framework limits on the same pages, and we used those details for the pros and cons in each block. We did not claim hands on testing, and we did not use review scores, awards, or customer counts to rank the tools.
What to check before you buy
Check the scope first. A SOC 2 report covers the Trust Services Criteria that apply to your service, and the software should map controls to those criteria, collect evidence from your systems, and export an audit package your CPA firm can use. Ask if the plan includes one framework or more, if extra frameworks are add-ons, and if the Trust Center, questionnaire automation, and vendor risk tools are included or charged separately. Check the employee band too. Drata Foundation covers up to 50 full time staff, Scytale Build covers under 150 employees, and Vanta Essentials covers one framework, so a team that crosses a band or adds a framework may face a higher quote at renewal. Check the audit cost separately. None of these tools can issue a SOC 2 report on its own, except Thoropass, which has a licensed audit firm in the same vendor. For the other seven tools, you will pay a CPA firm separately, so ask for the auditor fee, the observation period for a Type 2 report, and the evidence format the auditor expects. Ask for a written quote that names the plan, the framework count, the employee band, the term, and any add-ons.
| Team size | Best first shortlist | Budget note |
|---|---|---|
| Under 20 staff | Secureframe, Vanta, Sprinto | Start with Secureframe at $7,500 per year, and get quotes from Vanta and Sprinto for the same scope |
| 20 to 50 staff | Drata, Secureframe, Scytale | Drata Foundation covers up to 50 staff, and Scytale Build covers under 150 staff |
| 50 to 150 staff | Scytale, Vanta, Thoropass | Scytale Scale starts at 150 staff, so check the band before you sign |
| 150 to 1,000 staff | Scytale, Optro, Hyperproof | Expect a quote only price and a longer implementation, with risk and audit work in scope |
| Over 1,000 staff | Optro, Hyperproof, Scytale | Enterprise plans only, with multi entity support and a named implementation plan |
Frequently asked questions
What is SOC 2 reporting software?
SOC 2 reporting software helps a team prepare for a SOC 2 audit by mapping controls to the Trust Services Criteria, collecting evidence, tracking control status, and building the audit package. It does not issue the SOC 2 report. Only a licensed CPA firm can test the controls and sign the report.
How much does SOC 2 reporting software cost?
The cost varies by team size, framework count, and plan. Secureframe publishes a starting price of $7,500 per year for Fundamentals. Vanta, Drata, Sprinto, Thoropass, Scytale, Optro, and Hyperproof show no price on their own pricing pages and use quote only pricing. The auditor fee is separate for most tools, so budget for both together.
Which SOC 2 reporting tool is best for a startup?
A startup doing its first SOC 2 audit should shortlist Secureframe, Vanta, and Sprinto. Secureframe starts at $7,500 per year, Vanta Essentials covers one framework with automated evidence collection, and Sprinto is built for SaaS teams that want a lower cost option. Get a written quote from each for the same scope, and check the auditor fee.
Does SOC 2 software include the audit?
Most tools here do not include the audit. Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Scytale, Optro, and Hyperproof prepare evidence and reports, and a separate CPA firm performs the audit and issues the report. Thoropass is the exception, because it has a licensed audit firm in the same vendor.
How long does a first SOC 2 report take?
The time depends on control readiness, evidence quality, and auditor availability. A Type 1 report looks at control design at a point in time, while a Type 2 report looks at control operation over a period, often 3 to 12 months. Software can shorten preparation, but it cannot shorten the observation period for a Type 2 report.
What should I ask for in a quote?
Ask for the plan name, the framework count, the employee band, the contract term, and every add-on in writing. Ask if the Trust Center, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, and SSO are included, and ask what the renewal price will be. Also ask for the auditor fee and the evidence export format.
Sources
- https://www.vanta.com/
- https://www.vanta.com/pricing
- https://drata.com/
- https://drata.com/pricing
- https://secureframe.com/
- https://secureframe.com/pricing
- https://sprinto.com/
- https://sprinto.com/pricing
- https://thoropass.com/
- https://thoropass.com/pricing
- https://scytale.ai/
- https://scytale.ai/pricing
- https://www.auditboard.com/
- https://www.auditboard.com/pricing
- https://hyperproof.io/
- https://hyperproof.io/pricing
Prices and features were read on each company’s own website in November 2026. They change often, so confirm the current offer on the official site before you sign up or buy.