EvaluAgent is the best agent performance tracking platform for most teams that want a listed price, because AutoQM and Improvement starts from $35 per user per month and scores 100 percent of conversations, while Zendesk QA is the best choice for teams already on Zendesk. Only two tools in this list give a clear starting price, EvaluAgent from $35 per user per month and Zendesk QA at $35 per agent per month as an add-on, while the other six are quote only, so budget from those two anchors. ScorebuddyCX puts a hard number on AI scoring, with 500 AI scores a month in Accelerate and 1,000 in Elite, while Rippit puts a hard number on agent runs, with 100 Agent Runs a month on its free tier.
Pick a platform by coverage first, then by who counts as a user, then by price. A tool that scores a small sample gives a different picture from one that scores every conversation, and per-agent billing gives a different bill from per-conversation or per-score billing. The eight tools below cover those models, from a free tier with 100 Agent Runs a month to enterprise suites that combine forecasting, recording, quality, and coaching.
On this page
Best agent performance tracking platforms: comparison table
Swipe the table sideways on a phone to see every column.
| # | Name | Best for | Starting price | Free plan / trial | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EvaluAgent | Teams that want a listed price and full coverage | $35 per user/month | No | Visit |
| 2 | Zendesk QA | Zendesk teams that want QA inside one system | $35 per agent/month | Free trial (14 days) | Visit |
| 3 | ScorebuddyCX | Teams that want clear AI scoring limits | quote only | Free trial (guided pilot) | Visit |
| 4 | Playvox | Contact centers that want QA, coaching, and scheduling together | quote only | Free trial | Visit |
| 5 | Rippit | Small teams that want a free tier and agent runs | quote only | Yes | Visit |
| 6 | Observe.AI | Large voice teams that want Auto QA and live guidance | quote only | No | Visit |
| 7 | Calabrio ONE | Large centers that want forecasting with quality | quote only | No | Visit |
| 8 | Balto | Voice teams that want live guidance during calls | quote only | No | Visit |
The 8 best best agent performance tracking platforms, in detail
EvaluAgent
Best for: Teams that want a listed price and full coverage
EvaluAgent lists two seat plans on its pricing page. AutoQM and Improvement starts from $35 per user per month and includes voice transcription, multi-language support, custom scorecards, automated QA scoring on 100 percent of conversations, coaching workflows, and performance dashboards. The higher plan, AutoQM plus Conversation Intelligence, starts from $65 per user per month and adds reason for contact and intent detection, Spotlight and summarisation, insight topics, sentiment analytics, and predictive voice of the customer metrics.
- Human agents are priced by the seat, while AI agents can be priced by the conversation.
- Both plans include SSO, multi-factor authentication, role-based access, PII redaction, an audit log, and SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance, with EU an
- Integrations listed include Genesys Cloud, NICE CXone, Five9, Talkdesk, Amazon Connect, Salesforce, and Zendesk.
- Choose EvaluAgent if you want a number to budget from before a demo.
Pros
- AutoQM scores 100 percent of conversations
- listed prices from $35 and $65 per user per month
- coaching, goals, and gamification included
Cons
- No free plan, testing runs through a proof of concept
- Conversation Intelligence costs $65 per user per month, not $35
Zendesk QA
Best for: Zendesk teams that want QA inside one system
Zendesk QA, formerly Klaus, is sold as an add-on to Zendesk, not as a stand-alone plan. Zendesk lists the Quality Assurance add-on at $35 per agent per month billed annually, and the Workforce Engagement Bundle at $50 per agent per month billed annually. Base plans are Support Team at $19, Suite Team at $55, and Suite Professional at $115 per agent per month billed annually, so QA on Suite Team costs $55 plus $35 per agent per month.
- The QA add-on covers automated evaluation, custom scorecards, calibration, coaching workflows, and analytics, and Zendesk states that it scores 100 pe
- Choose Zendesk QA if your team already lives in Zendesk and you want QA, coaching, and ticketing in one place.
- Do not choose it as a cheap stand-alone QA tool, because the base plan cost sits under the $35 add-on price.
Pros
- QA add-on at $35 per agent per month billed annually
- Workforce Engagement Bundle at $50 per agent per month
- scores 100 percent of conversations
Cons
- QA is an add-on on top of a Zendesk base plan
- the $35 add-on does not include the base Suite price
ScorebuddyCX
Best for: Teams that want clear AI scoring limits
ScorebuddyCX sells three plans, Foundation, Accelerate, and Elite, and its official pricing page sets out what each plan includes without listing a dollar figure, so the starting price here is quote only. Foundation is the complete QA program, with customizable scorecards, QA workflows, a calibration module, agent dashboards, and advanced and compliance reporting. Accelerate adds AI Auto Scoring, with 500 monthly AI scores included, plus a coaching module, business intelligence dashboards, and a dedicated client manager.
- Elite adds Conversation Analytics and 1,000 monthly AI scores, plus AI voice transcription, Salesforce and Open API integrations, single sign-on, and
- Contracts are annual, and the vendor offers a free trial as a guided pilot, where its team builds scorecards with you.
- Choose ScorebuddyCX if you want a clear AI score allowance in writing.
- Do not choose it if you need a listed price without a sales call.
Pros
- Accelerate includes 500 AI scores a month
- Elite includes 1,000 AI scores a month
- Foundation includes scorecards, calibration, and agent dashboards
Cons
- No price is listed on the official pricing page
- AI Transcription credits are only in Elite
Playvox
Best for: Contact centers that want QA, coaching, and scheduling together
Playvox is a workforce engagement platform for contact centers, built around quality management, performance management, coaching, workforce management, and analytics in one suite. QA scores, coaching tasks, schedules, and performance dashboards can sit in one system instead of four. The vendor does not list a price on its official site, and its pricing page returns a not-found response, so the starting price here is quote only.
- Ask which modules are included, how many users count as billable, and what onboarding and training cost.
- A small team that only needs scorecards may find a narrower tool cheaper.
- Choose Playvox if you want QA, coaching, and scheduling under one contract.
- Do not choose it if you only need a simple scorecard tool.
Pros
- Combines quality management, performance, coaching, and workforce management
- agent dashboards and scorecards in one suite
Cons
- No price is listed on the official site
- the suite model means you may buy modules you do not need
Rippit
Best for: Small teams that want a free tier and agent runs
Rippit is the current name for the product that was MaestroQA, and its pricing page now measures use in Agent Runs instead of seats. A free tier includes 100 Agent Runs a month, unlimited Q and A, integrations with Intercom, Decagon, Gong, and Granola, and $100 in AI credits, with no credit card required to start. Starter includes 300 Agent Runs a month, Growth includes 1,000, and Enterprise includes 1,000 or more, plus a dedicated AI agent specialist and single sign-on.
- An Agent Run is one execution of an Agent App, which is a reusable workflow, so coaching 20 agents each week counts as 20 Agent Runs a week.
- That meter differs from per-seat pricing, where a seat costs the same whether the agent is coached once a month or once a week.
- Rippit says it analyzes 100 percent of conversations.
- Choose Rippit if you want to start free and you like usage-based pricing.
Pros
- Free tier includes 100 Agent Runs a month and $100 in AI credits
- Starter includes 300 Agent Runs a month
- Growth includes 1,000 Agent Runs a month
Cons
- No dollar price is shown on the official pricing page
- enterprise pricing is custom
Observe.AI
Best for: Large voice teams that want Auto QA and live guidance
Observe.AI is a contact center AI platform built around voice, with Auto QA, Real-time AI, and VoiceAI agents sold as separate products in one platform. Its pricing page lists plan options by goal, but it shows no dollar figure on any tier, so the starting price here is quote only. The same page states that its target teams run from 100 to 100,000 agents, with a team lead to agent ratio of 1 to 15 or more, which sets the scale it is built for.
- Auto QA evaluates conversations against a scorecard and ties each score to transcript evidence, while Real-time AI gives agents live guidance and Voic
- That combination suits a voice-heavy center, but a small team may buy more platform than it needs.
- Choose Observe.AI if you run a large voice operation and you want full coverage plus live guidance.
- Do not choose it if you need a listed price or a small-team plan.
Pros
- Auto QA scores every conversation in scope
- Real-time AI gives live guidance
- VoiceAI agents are sold in the same platform
Cons
- No price is listed on the official pricing page
- the platform is built for larger teams, not small ones
Calabrio ONE
Best for: Large centers that want forecasting with quality
Calabrio ONE is now part of Verint after the two companies merged in November 2025, and calabrio.com now opens the Verint workforce engagement management page. The suite covers workforce management, quality intelligence, compliance, interaction recording, and performance management, with forecasting, scheduling, and real-time adherence. Quality Intelligence evaluates up to 100 percent of interactions across human and AI agents, and Performance Management gives real-time visibility with role-based scorecards.
- That link between scheduling and quality is the point of the suite.
- The vendor does not list a price, so the starting price here is quote only, and you should ask for a per-agent quote by module.
- Choose Calabrio ONE if you run a large center and you want forecasting, recording, quality, and performance in one contract.
- Do not choose it if you only need a light QA tool.
Pros
- Quality Intelligence evaluates up to 100 percent of interactions
- Performance Management gives role-based scorecards
- forecasting and scheduling in the same suite
Cons
- No price is listed on the official site
- the product is now part of Verint, so the brand and roadmap sit under one company
Balto
Best for: Voice teams that want live guidance during calls
Balto is a contact center AI platform that puts live guidance first, with Agent Assist, QA Automation, Agentic Insights, and Voice Agents in one system. During a call, Balto listens and shows prompts, checklists, and rebuttals that match what the caller says, so an agent can follow the script and handle objections without searching for notes. After the call, Balto provides call summaries, transcripts, and QA scoring, and supervisors can search calls without listening to every recording.
- The vendor does not list a price, so the starting price here is quote only, and you should ask whether live guidance, QA Automation, and Voice Agents
- Choose Balto if your team works mainly by voice and you want help during calls.
- Do not choose it if your work is mostly tickets and chat.
Pros
- Real-time prompts guide agents during live calls
- QA Automation scores all calls
- call summaries and checklists are built in
Cons
- No price is listed on the official site
- the focus is live voice work, not ticket QA
How we chose
We chose tools that score, track, or guide agent work against a set of quality standards, and we kept only tools with a live official site and a real product for support teams. Prices and plan limits come from official vendor pricing pages and homepages opened on 2026-11-12. Where a vendor showed no price, we wrote quote only instead of repeating a third-party estimate. We did not test any tool hands-on, and we did not use customer counts, awards, or review scores to rank the tools.
Which platform fits your team size and budget
| Team size | Best fit | Starting price to budget from | Watch the limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 20 agents | Rippit free tier, then EvaluAgent | $0 on Rippit free tier, then $35 per user per month on EvaluAgent | Rippit free tier allows 100 Agent Runs a month |
| 20 to 100 agents | EvaluAgent, Zendesk QA, ScorebuddyCX | $35 per user per month on EvaluAgent, $35 per agent per month on Zendesk QA | ScorebuddyCX Accelerate allows 500 AI scores a month |
| 100 or more agents | Observe.AI, Calabrio ONE, Playvox, Balto | quote only on all four | Observe.AI targets teams from 100 to 100,000 agents |
Frequently asked questions
What is the best agent performance tracking platform for most teams?
EvaluAgent is the best choice for most teams that want a listed price, because AutoQM and Improvement starts from $35 per user per month, scores 100 percent of conversations, and includes custom scorecards, coaching workflows, and performance dashboards. Zendesk QA is the best choice for teams already on Zendesk, at $35 per agent per month billed annually.
How much does agent performance tracking software cost?
Costs range from $0 on the Rippit free tier to $35 per user per month on EvaluAgent, $35 per agent per month on Zendesk QA as an add-on, and $65 per user per month on EvaluAgent with Conversation Intelligence. Six tools in this list are quote only, so ask each vendor for a written per-agent quote, and add the base plan cost where QA is an add-on.
Which platform is best for small teams?
Rippit is the best choice for small teams that want to start without a contract, because its free tier includes 100 Agent Runs a month, unlimited Q and A, and $100 in AI credits, with no credit card required. EvaluAgent is the best small-team choice for a listed per-seat price, at $35 per user per month.
Which platform scores every conversation instead of a sample?
EvaluAgent, Zendesk QA, Rippit, Observe.AI, and Calabrio ONE all state that they score or evaluate 100 percent of conversations in scope, instead of a small manual sample. That coverage matters when a compliance miss or a coaching gap hides in the calls no one reviewed.
Do I need a separate tool if I already use Zendesk?
No, not always. Zendesk QA adds automated scoring, calibration, and coaching to Zendesk at $35 per agent per month billed annually, and the Workforce Engagement Bundle adds QA and workforce management together at $50 per agent per month billed annually. A separate tool makes sense only if you run several helpdesk systems at once.
What happened to MaestroQA and Calabrio?
MaestroQA is now Rippit, where pricing is measured in Agent Runs, with a free tier at 100 Agent Runs a month. Calabrio ONE is now part of Verint after the two companies merged in November 2025, and calabrio.com now opens the Verint page.
Sources
- https://www.evaluagent.com
- https://www.evaluagent.com/pricing
- https://www.zendesk.com
- https://www.zendesk.com/pricing/
- https://www.scorebuddycx.com
- https://www.scorebuddycx.com/pricing
- https://www.playvox.com
- https://www.rippit.com
- https://www.rippit.com/pricing
- https://www.observe.ai
- https://www.observe.ai/pricing
- https://www.calabrio.com
- https://www.balto.ai
Prices and features were read on each company’s own website in November 2026. They change often, so confirm the current offer on the official site before you sign up or buy.