Graphite is the best starting point for GitHub teams that want stacked pull requests, and CodeRabbit is the best direct replacement for most teams that want AI review without changing how they branch. Graphite now sits inside Cursor after Anysphere, the company behind Cursor, acquired it in December 2025, and the product now lives at graphite.com with Cursor Cloud Agents inside it. The cheapest subscription seat in this set is GitHub Team at $4 per user per month, while Sourcery Pro at $12 per seat per month is the cheapest AI reviewer with a per-seat price.
This article covers Graphite the code review tool for GitHub, not Graphite the monitoring tool and not graphite the material. Graphite for code review is built around stacked pull requests, a merge queue, and an AI reviewer. The alternatives below cover the same job in different ways: some keep the stacked workflow, some add AI review to normal pull requests, and two give human review controls without an AI reviewer.
On this page
Graphite alternatives: comparison table
Swipe the table sideways on a phone to see every column.
| # | Name | Best for | Starting price | Free plan / trial | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graphite | GitHub teams using stacked pull requests | $20 per user/month | Yes | Visit |
| 2 | CodeRabbit | Teams wanting AI review on every pull request | $24 per user/month | Yes | Visit |
| 3 | Qodo | Teams with many repos and shared review volume | $30 per month | Free trial (14 days) | Visit |
| 4 | Greptile | Teams wanting full codebase context per review | $1 per credit | Yes | Visit |
| 5 | Sourcery | Small teams wanting low cost AI review | $12 per seat/month | Yes | Visit |
| 6 | CodeAnt AI | Teams wanting review plus security scanning in one pass | $24 per user/month | Free trial (14 days) | Visit |
| 7 | GitHub | Teams wanting human review controls at a low seat price | $4 per user/month | Yes | Visit |
| 8 | Gerrit | Teams wanting a self-hosted review system at $0 | $0 | Yes | Visit |
The 8 best graphite alternatives, in detail
Graphite
Best for: GitHub teams using stacked pull requests
Graphite breaks a large change into a stack of small, dependent pull requests. Hobby is free for personal account repos and includes the CLI, the VS Code extension, and limited Graphite Chat and AI reviews. Starter costs $20 per user per month billed annually and adds all GitHub organization repos, Slack notifications, and team insights.
- Team costs $40 per user per month billed annually and adds unlimited AI reviews, automations, and the merge queue.
- Enterprise is custom and adds SAML, ACLs, and audit logs.
- Choose Graphite if your team already lives on GitHub and large pull requests slow reviews down.
- Do not choose it if your code sits on GitLab, Bitbucket, or Azure DevOps, because the product is GitHub only.
Pros
- Stacked pull requests with a CLI and VS Code extension
- merge queue on the Team plan
- unlimited AI reviews on the Team plan
Cons
- GitHub only, so other code hosts are out
- AI reviews are limited on Hobby and Starter
- merge queue needs Team at $40 per user per month
CodeRabbit
Best for: Teams wanting AI review on every pull request
CodeRabbit reviews pull requests with a plain language summary, a walkthrough, diagrams, and inline comments. Essentials costs $24 per user per month billed annually, or $30 month to month, and includes 5 PR reviews per developer per hour, Learnings from prior pull requests, and one-click fixes. Team costs $48 per user per month billed annually and raises the allowance to 8 reviews per developer per hour.
- Advanced costs $72 per user per month billed annually.
- Public repos are free, and the free plan for private repos gives PR summaries rather than full review.
- Choose CodeRabbit if you want AI review without changing how your team branches.
- A developer who opens many pull requests in one hour can hit the Essentials limit of 5, and extra reviews are billed on consumption with a cap you can
Pros
- Works on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket
- Essentials allows 5 PR reviews per developer per hour
- one-click fixes for findings
Cons
- Reviews beyond the hourly allowance are metered on consumption
- full PR review for private repos needs Essentials
- Team at $48 per user per month doubles the seat price for higher limits
Qodo
Best for: Teams with many repos and shared review volume
Qodo, formerly CodiumAI, sells review by credits rather than by seat. The pricing page lists $0.015 per credit, pooled across the team, with packs of 2,000 credits for about 14 reviews a month, 4,000 for about 29, and 16,000 for about 114. The smallest pack costs $30 per month.
- Pro Team has no annual commitment, and Enterprise is a custom plan for teams with 30 or more users.
- The 14-day trial gives unlimited credits with no card required.
- Choose Qodo if your review volume is uneven across the team, because pooled credits let a quiet developer share capacity with a busy one.
- Credits expire each month, and large pull requests draw more credits per review.
Pros
- Credits are pooled across the team with no per-seat charge on Pro Team
- cross-repo review with a rules system
- 14-day trial with unlimited credits
Cons
- No permanent free tier after the trial
- credits expire at the end of each monthly cycle
- overage continues at the same per-credit rate up to a cap you set
Greptile
Best for: Teams wanting full codebase context per review
Greptile indexes a whole codebase into a graph and reviews each pull request with that context, rather than reading only the changed lines. Starter is free for 1 active developer with 50 credits per month. Pro has no seat fees: you buy credits at $1 each, shared across the whole org.
- A Base review costs 1 credit, a Plus review costs 3, and an Apex review costs 10.
- Enterprise is custom and adds self-hosting and SSO and SAML.
- Choose Greptile if your hardest reviews cross file and service boundaries.
- The number to model is review depth: 50 Base reviews cost 50 credits, while 50 Apex reviews cost 500 credits.
Pros
- Starter is free for 1 active developer with 50 credits per month
- Pro has no seat fees and credits are shared across the org
- Base review costs 1 credit
Cons
- An Apex review costs 10 credits, so deep reviews use the pool fast
- annual and multi-year pricing is custom and not listed
- self-hosting needs Enterprise custom pricing
Sourcery
Best for: Small teams wanting low cost AI review
Sourcery reviews pull requests on GitHub and GitLab with line-by-line feedback, PR summaries, custom rules, and one-click fixes. The Open Source plan is free forever for public repos and includes AI reviews, PR summaries, custom rules, and security checks on every pull request. Pro costs $12 per seat per month billed annually, or $15 month to month, and adds AI reviews on private repos and Jira integration.
- Team costs $24 per seat per month billed annually, or $30 month to month, and adds nightly scans of 50 repos and team analytics.
- Enterprise is custom and adds self-hosting, GitHub Enterprise Server, and SSO.
- Choose Sourcery if price per seat is the deciding factor and your team works on GitHub or GitLab.
- A 5-developer team spends $60 per month on Pro, against $120 on CodeRabbit Essentials.
Pros
- Open Source plan is free for public repos
- Pro at $12 per seat per month is the lowest per-seat AI review price in this set
- security checks run on every pull request
Cons
- Pro security scans cover 10 repos twice weekly, while Team covers 50 nightly
- GitHub Enterprise Server needs Enterprise
- bring your own LLM keys need Enterprise
CodeAnt AI
Best for: Teams wanting review plus security scanning in one pass
CodeAnt AI combines AI code review with SAST, secrets detection, IaC scanning, and quality gates in one platform, across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps. Premium costs $24 per user per month billed annually and includes unlimited AI reviews, SAST, dashboards, and Jira integration. The 14-day free trial includes 100 PR reviews with no card required.
- Enterprise is custom and adds SSO, audit logs, and on-prem or VPC deployment.
- Choose CodeAnt AI if your team currently runs a separate security scanner alongside code review and wants one bill and one set of findings.
- Unlimited reviews on Premium remove the hourly or credit allowance math that CodeRabbit, Qodo, and Greptile require.
- The trade-off is price: $24 per user per month is double Sourcery Pro.
Pros
- Unlimited PR reviews on Premium
- SAST, secrets detection, and IaC scanning in the same pass
- 14-day trial with 100 PR reviews and no card required
Cons
- No permanent free plan after the trial
- Enterprise is custom for on-prem or VPC deployment
- Premium at $24 is double Sourcery Pro at $12 per seat per month
GitHub
Best for: Teams wanting human review controls at a low seat price
GitHub is the code host that Graphite is built on, and its own pull request review controls suit teams that do not need an AI reviewer or a stacked workflow. The Free plan costs $0 and includes unlimited public and private repos and 2,000 CI/CD minutes per month. Team costs $4 per user per month and adds repository rules, multiple reviewers, draft pull requests, code owners, and required reviewers.
- Enterprise starts at $21 per user per month and adds Copilot access, SAML single sign-on, and 50,000 CI/CD minutes per month.
- Choose GitHub Team if your review problem is process, not volume: required reviewers and code owners give a small team a clear approval path for $20 p
- Do not choose it if you need stacked pull requests or AI review, because neither is part of the $4 plan.
Pros
- Team at $4 per user per month is the lowest subscription seat price in this set
- required reviewers and code owners on Team
- Free plan includes unlimited public and private repos
Cons
- No AI reviewer is included in the $4 Team plan, Copilot is separate
- SAML single sign-on needs Enterprise at $21 per user per month
- draft pull requests and multiple reviewers are Team features, not Free features
Gerrit
Best for: Teams wanting a self-hosted review system at $0
Gerrit is a web-based code review system for Git repos, with patchset based review, fine-grained permissions, and CI integration. It is 100 percent open source with no licensing fees. Each change is reviewed as a single commit, and a change usually needs a +2 Code-Review vote to submit.
- GerritHub.io offers a hosted Gerrit instance that is free to use, even for private repos.
- Choose Gerrit if your team wants full control of its review system and has the staff to run a Java service, or if a $0 licence fee matters more than a
- Do not choose it if your team expects a GitHub pull request flow, a hosted service, or an AI reviewer, because Gerrit gives you none of those by defau
Pros
- Free open source software under Apache License 2.0 with no licence fees
- patchset based review with fine-grained permissions
- self-hosted with full access to source code
Cons
- Your team hosts and maintains it, so server and upkeep costs sit with you
- no built-in AI reviewer
- review is per commit rather than per pull request, so GitHub teams must learn a new flow
How we chose
We chose tools that do the same job as Graphite the code review tool: review code before it merges, on GitHub or on more than one code host. Graphite itself is included because it is still a real option at graphite.com. Prices and plan limits come from official vendor pricing pages opened on 2026-11-12, and each Sources link points to the page used for that tool. We did not test any tool hands-on. We did not install, use, or run any of these products, and we did not rank them by customer counts, awards, or review scores. The unique fact is the Cursor deal: Anysphere, the company behind Cursor, acquired Graphite in December 2025, the product now lives at graphite.com with Cursor Cloud Agents inside it, and the old Diamond AI reviewer brand is gone.
Pick by team size and budget
| Situation | First pick | Monthly cost at that size | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solo developer, personal repos | Graphite Hobby or Greptile Starter | $0 | Free tier for 1 developer, with 50 credits per month on Greptile Starter |
| Small team, 5 developers, GitHub only | GitHub Team | $20 | $4 per user per month buys required reviewers and code owners |
| Small team, 5 developers, AI review | Sourcery Pro | $60 | $12 per seat per month, the lowest per-seat AI review price here |
| Growing team, 10 developers, stacked PRs | Graphite Team | $400 | $40 per user per month, first plan with unlimited AI reviews and the merge queue |
| Growing team, 10 developers, flat AI review | CodeRabbit Essentials | $240 | $24 per user per month, 5 reviews per developer per hour, no credit pool |
| High volume, uneven reviewers | Qodo Pro Team | $30 per month for the 2,000-credit pack | Pooled credits at $0.015 each, shared across the team |
| Regulated or self-hosted team | Gerrit | $0 licence fee | Open source, but your team carries hosting and upkeep |
Frequently asked questions
Which graphite alternative is best for most teams?
CodeRabbit is the best pick for most teams, because it reviews normal pull requests on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket at $24 per user per month billed annually, with 5 reviews per developer per hour on Essentials. Graphite is better only if your team commits to stacked pull requests on GitHub.
How much do graphite alternatives cost?
Prices start at $0 for Gerrit and GitHub Free, $4 per user per month for GitHub Team, $12 per seat per month billed annually for Sourcery Pro, $20 for Graphite Starter, and $24 for CodeRabbit Essentials and CodeAnt AI Premium. Qodo starts at $30 per month for a 2,000-credit pack, and Greptile Pro charges $1 per credit with no seat fee.
Is there a free graphite alternative?
Yes. Gerrit is free open source software, GitHub Free costs $0 with unlimited repos, Graphite Hobby is free for personal account repos, Greptile Starter is free for 1 developer with 50 credits per month, and Sourcery Open Source is free for public repos. CodeRabbit and Qodo offer a 14-day trial instead of a permanent free tier for private repos.
What happened to Graphite after the Cursor deal?
Anysphere, the company behind Cursor, acquired Graphite in December 2025, and Graphite now lives at graphite.com with Cursor Cloud Agents inside it. The old Diamond AI reviewer brand is gone, and unlimited AI reviews sit on the Team plan at $40 per user per month billed annually.
Which option fits a team that does not use GitHub?
CodeRabbit, Qodo, and CodeAnt AI all work across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps, Sourcery works on GitHub and GitLab, and Gerrit works with any Git repo you host yourself. Graphite is GitHub only, so a team on GitLab or Bitbucket should start with CodeRabbit or Qodo.
Sources
- https://graphite.com
- https://graphite.com/pricing
- https://coderabbit.ai
- https://coderabbit.ai/pricing
- https://www.qodo.ai
- https://www.qodo.ai/pricing/
- https://www.greptile.com
- https://www.greptile.com/pricing
- https://sourcery.ai
- https://sourcery.ai/pricing
- https://codeant.ai
- https://codeant.ai/pricing
- https://github.com
- https://github.com/pricing
- https://www.gerritcodereview.com
Prices and features were read on each company’s own website in November 2026. They change often, so confirm the current offer on the official site before you sign up or buy.