The best patient engagement software with EMR/EHR integration writes data back into your record system, so scheduling, intake, messaging and payments update one chart instead of four tools. Only one tool in this list publishes a starting price: SimplePractice from $49 per month for a single practitioner. The other seven are quote only, so request a written quote that names every module, message allowance and integration fee. Phreesia, Luma Health, NexHealth, Relatient and Artera fit larger practices and health systems, with deep EHR connections and automation across the whole patient journey.
We compared 8 options for best patient engagement software with emr/ehr. Each profile below lists the price, free plan, pros and cons as published by the company.
On this page
Best patient engagement software with emr/ehr: comparison table
Swipe the table sideways on a phone to see every column.
| # | Name | Best for | Starting price | Free plan / trial | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phreesia | Large practices digitizing check-in, intake and payments | Quote only | No | Visit |
| 2 | Luma Health | Medical groups that need scheduling, waitlists and referrals | Quote only | No | Visit |
| 3 | NexHealth | Practices that want intake synced with real-time scheduling | Quote only | No | Visit |
| 4 | Relatient | Health systems and practices that need rules-based scheduling | Quote only | No | Visit |
| 5 | Artera | Health systems with high message volume across channels | Quote only | No | Visit |
| 6 | Solutionreach | Dental, vision and medical practices focused on recall | Quote only | No | Visit |
| 7 | Klara | Specialty practices that need secure two-way messaging | Quote only | No | Visit |
| 8 | SimplePractice | Solo and small group practices that want an EHR with engagement built in | $49 per month | Free trial (30 days) | Visit |
The 8 best best patient engagement software with emr/ehrs, in detail
Phreesia
Best for: Large practices digitizing check-in, intake and payments
Phreesia is a patient intake and engagement platform used by hospitals, specialty clinics and large groups. It covers scheduling, registration, digital check-in, insurance verification, payments and messaging, and it writes data back into the record system so front-desk staff work from one chart. Patients complete forms on a phone, verify insurance before the visit and settle copays at check-in, which cuts front-desk queues and manual entry errors.
- The platform connects with Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, Meditech and AdvancedMD, so intake data lands in the EHR without retyping.
- It also offers AI voice scheduling and after-hours triage, plus automated reminders and post-visit messaging.
- The limit is price transparency: Phreesia publishes no price list, and its pricing page says quotes are customized to the size, workflows and products
- Its Intake platform is free through spring 2027, with standard pricing to follow, so ask for the price that applies after that date in writing before
Pros
- Digital check-in with insurance verification and payments in one flow
- integrates with Epic, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks and other major EHRs
Cons
- No published price list, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- the free Intake offer ends in spring 2027, so standard pricing follows
Luma Health
Best for: Medical groups that need scheduling, waitlists and referrals
Luma Health is a patient engagement platform for medical groups, clinics and health systems that ties scheduling, reminders, intake, messaging and payments to the EHR. Patients can self-schedule through a widget on the practice website, and the smart waitlist contacts patients automatically when a slot opens, which keeps the schedule full without extra calls. Referral management is a strength: when a specialist receives a referral, Luma contacts the patient, follows up if there is no reply and reports back to the provider.
- Reminders work in more than 20 languages, and digital intake forms pull data from the record system so patients do not repeat information at each visi
- The platform integrates with Epic, Cerner, athenahealth and eClinicalWorks.
- The limit is cost and setup: Luma publishes no price list, and contracts are quoted per organization, so a small practice should request a written quo
- Implementation is heavier than lighter tools because enterprise EHR connections take time to configure and test.
Pros
- Self-scheduling widget plus smart waitlist that backfills cancellations
- reminders in more than 20 languages
Cons
- No published price list, so budgeting needs a sales quote
- implementation is heavier than lighter tools because enterprise EHR connections take time to configure
NexHealth
Best for: Practices that want intake synced with real-time scheduling
NexHealth is a patient experience platform that sits on top of an EHR or practice management system and adds online scheduling, digital forms, messaging, reminders, reviews, insurance verification and card payments. Its Synchronizer keeps the EHR and the engagement tools in real-time two-way sync, so a booking, a completed form or a payment updates the same record at once. Patients can book online, join a virtual waitlist, complete intake in advance and receive reminders without a phone call.
- The product set is sold as modules, including Scheduling, Communications, Forms, Payments, Insurance Verification and Insights, so a practice can star
- Billing is month to month or annual, with the annual plan charged in full in advance and no cancellation fees.
- The drawback is pricing transparency: the practice pricing page carries a quote process and no dollar figure for the main packages, and each extra mod
- Ask which products the quote covers and how many locations it includes.
Pros
- Real-time two-way sync between the EHR and engagement tools
- month-to-month billing with no cancellation fees
Cons
- No published package price, so costs need a quote
- modules are sold separately, so the total climbs as you add products
Relatient
Best for: Health systems and practices that need rules-based scheduling
Relatient is a patient access platform built around Dash, which brings scheduling, communication, intake and payments into one system. It offers self-scheduling with rules based on provider, location and specialty, automated reminders across text, email and voice, two-way texting, digital registration and in-app payments. Rules-based booking keeps the right patients in the right slots without staff sorting each request by hand.
- The platform integrates with athenahealth, Epic, Cerner, NextGen, eClinicalWorks, Greenway Health and Veradigm, and it holds HIPAA, HITRUST and SOC 2
- It is a recognized athenahealth partner for intelligent scheduling.
- The limit is a small one with real effects: patients cannot cancel or reschedule directly from a text or email reminder, and must use the portal inste
- Relatient also offers no free plan or free trial, and pricing is set by quote based on size, providers, locations and the Dash modules selected.
Pros
- Dash unifies scheduling, messaging, intake and payments in one system
- integrates with Epic, athenahealth, Cerner and eClinicalWorks
Cons
- Patients cannot cancel or reschedule directly from a reminder link
- no free plan or free trial is offered
Artera
Best for: Health systems with high message volume across channels
Artera, formerly WELL Health, is a patient communication platform for health systems, specialty practices, federally qualified health centers and federal agencies. It brings text, email, phone and voice AI agents into one platform, with automated reminders, intake links, follow-up messages, referral outreach and care gap campaigns. AI agents handle routine conversations such as scheduling, intake, referral management and payments, which cuts phone volume for busy front desks.
- The Artera Harmony platform connects those messages to the EHR so outreach matches the visit and the care plan, and Artera says it supports more than
- Security credentials include SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST and HIPAA compliance, plus FedRAMP Class D certification.
- The limit is access: Artera publishes no price list, and its pricing page returns a not-found error, so every contract is a custom quote shaped by loc
- Ask for the price per location and the setup fee for each EHR connection.
Pros
- Text, email and voice AI agents in one platform with EHR integration
- SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST and HIPAA compliance
Cons
- No published price list, and its pricing page returns a not-found error
- custom contracts suit mid-market and enterprise buyers more than small clinics
Solutionreach
Best for: Dental, vision and medical practices focused on recall
Solutionreach is a long-running patient engagement platform for dental, vision and medical practices, built around automated reminders, recall and reactivation outreach, two-way texting, surveys and marketing campaigns. Its plans carry monthly SMS allowances of 1,750 on Patient Connect, 3,500 on Practice Efficiency and 4,500 on Practice Growth, with a tailored allowance on Enterprise, so a large practice can plan message volume in advance. Digital intake, online scheduling, batch messaging and text-to-pay sit in the same system.
- The platform connects with more than 500 EHR and practice management systems, including Dentrix and Eaglesoft, which suits practices that run on a spe
- It also offers an AI receptionist as an add-on from the Practice Efficiency plan upward.
- The limit is the contract: the pricing FAQ lists yearly terms only, with no month-to-month option shown, and no package prices are published, so each
- Ask about the renewal notice window and the cost of messages above the monthly allowance before you sign.
Pros
- Monthly SMS allowances up to 4,500 messages on Practice Growth
- connects with more than 500 EHR and practice management systems
Cons
- Yearly contracts only, with no month-to-month option shown
- no published package prices, so each tier needs a quote
Klara
Best for: Specialty practices that need secure two-way messaging
Klara, now part of ModMed, is a HIPAA-compliant messaging platform for medical practices that replaces phone tag with a shared inbox. Patients text the practice number or message through a web widget, and staff see every conversation in one thread, with messages routed by topic, urgency or patient history through AI-powered routing. Patients never see personal phone numbers, and all messages are encrypted and logged, which keeps records complete.
- The platform also covers appointment reminders, digital intake forms, voicemail-to-text transcription and video visits that patients can join without
- It integrates with ModMed, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks and DrChrono.
- The limit is scope: Klara does not include billing features such as eligibility verification or claim validation, and it does not handle scheduling or
- Pricing is quote-based with no public rate card, and there is no free plan, so request a quote that names the price per provider.
Pros
- Shared inbox with AI message routing by urgency and topic
- video visits patients join without a login
Cons
- No billing features such as eligibility verification or claim validation
- pricing is quote-based with no public rate card
SimplePractice
Best for: Solo and small group practices that want an EHR with engagement built in
SimplePractice is an EHR and practice management platform for solo and group practices in therapy, counseling and allied health, and it is the only tool in this list that publishes its prices. It combines scheduling, documentation, a client portal, telehealth, online appointment requests, secure messaging and billing in one system, so engagement features sit inside the record. Clients can request appointments online, complete intake forms, receive reminders and join telehealth sessions from the same portal.
- Plans start at $49 a month for Starter, $79 for Essential and $99 for Plus for a single practitioner, with a 30-day free trial and no credit card need
- Essential adds appointment reminders and secure messaging, while Plus adds group appointments and group telehealth, with extra clinicians from $74 a m
- The limits are scope and add-ons: the platform is built for US practices, Starter has no appointment reminders, and AI note-taking, ePrescribe and cla
- Check which add-ons your workflow needs before you compare the headline price with the rest of this list.
Pros
- Published plans from $49 a month with a 30-day free trial
- built-in EHR with client portal, telehealth and online booking
Cons
- Starter plan has no appointment reminders
- AI notes, ePrescribe and claim fees all cost extra
How we chose
We opened the vendor pricing page for SimplePractice on 2026-11-12, and we opened the pricing page for Artera, which returns a not-found error. We checked the other vendors through their own documentation and independent pricing audits dated September to November 2026, which confirm that none of them publishes a price list. Where a vendor publishes no price, this article says quote only rather than repeating a third-party estimate.
We compared EHR integration depth, the range of engagement features, contract terms and free trial availability. We looked at whether the connection writes data back into the record system or only reads appointment times, since that decides how much manual work the tool removes. We did not test the software, and we did not rank the tools using review scores, awards or customer counts. Prices change, so confirm the current price and the full contract terms with the vendor before you sign.
What to check before you buy
Start with the EHR connection. Ask whether the integration writes data back into the chart or only reads appointment times, and confirm that your exact EHR and version are supported. A read-only link still leaves staff retyping intake forms and payment records, while a two-way sync removes that work. Ask for a signed business associate agreement, and confirm how the vendor handles protected health information across text, email and voice channels.
Then check the contract and the message limits. Quote-only vendors set the price by providers, locations, modules and message volume, so get the quote in writing with every fee named. Ask about the SMS allowance and the cost of messages above it, the length of the contract, the renewal notice window, and the implementation and integration fees for year one. Confirm who handles the integration work, what training is included, and how long setup takes for a practice of your size.
| Practice size | First choice | Monthly budget to plan for | | Solo practice, 1 clinician | SimplePractice Starter | $49 to $99, plus add-ons | | Small practice, 2 to 5 providers | Klara, or SimplePractice Plus | Quote, or $99 plus $74 per extra clinician | | Mid-size practice, 6 to 20 providers | Relatient or NexHealth | Quote, plus implementation fees | | Multi-location group | Luma Health or Solutionreach | Quote, yearly contract | | Health system | Phreesia or Artera | Quote, custom contract |
Frequently asked questions
What is patient engagement software with EMR/EHR integration?
It is software that handles patient communication and admin tasks, such as reminders, scheduling, intake forms, messaging and payments, while sharing data with the electronic health or medical record. Integration means a booking, a completed form or a message updates the patient chart without staff retyping it. The best tools write data back into the EHR, while weaker ones only read appointment times. Ask whether the connection is read-only or two-way before you buy.
How much does patient engagement software with EHR integration cost?
Only SimplePractice in this list publishes a price, from $49 a month for one practitioner. The other seven vendors are quote only, and third-party listings report starting points from about $99 to $350 a month. The real cost depends on providers, locations, modules and message volume, plus implementation and integration fees. Always request a written quote that names every fee, and ask what the price covers after any free offer ends.
Which EHR systems do these tools integrate with?
Most tools in this list connect with Epic, athenahealth, Cerner and eClinicalWorks, and several add NextGen, Greenway Health, Veradigm, ModMed and DrChrono. NexHealth and Luma Health cover the widest range of enterprise record systems, while SimplePractice is an EHR in its own right, so it needs no separate connection. Confirm that your exact EHR and version are supported, and ask whether the integration writes data back into the chart.
Do any of these tools offer a free plan?
None of the eight tools offers a free plan. SimplePractice offers a 30-day free trial with no credit card needed to start, and Phreesia offers free access to its Intake platform through spring 2027, with standard pricing to follow. The other vendors offer demos and quotes rather than trials. Use the trial or demo to test the EHR connection with your own record system before you commit to a contract.
How long does setup take?
Setup time depends on the EHR connection and the number of locations. Lighter tools such as SimplePractice can be running in days, since the EHR is built in. Enterprise platforms such as Luma Health, Artera and Phreesia take longer, because each EHR connection, template and workflow needs configuration and testing. Ask the vendor for a written timeline, who handles the integration work, and what training is included in the price.
Sources
- https://www.phreesia.com/
- https://www.lumahealth.io/
- https://www.nexhealth.com/
- https://www.relatient.com/
- https://artera.io/
- https://artera.io/pricing/
- https://www.solutionreach.com/
- https://www.klara.com/
- https://www.simplepractice.com/
- https://www.simplepractice.com/pricing/
Prices and features were read on each company’s own website in November 2026. They change often, so confirm the current offer on the official site before you sign up or buy.